2012
DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2011.10.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transverse Incision for Calcaneal Tuberosity Avulsion Fractures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These might be due to the fact that the incision was parallel to the skin lines. In addition, the incision could directly expose the avulsed bone fragments, which was conducive to the operation [ 31 ]. Our study also found that the incision had little invasion to the soft tissue, and the incision along the transverse lines of the skin was more conducive to the beauty of the postoperative scar.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These might be due to the fact that the incision was parallel to the skin lines. In addition, the incision could directly expose the avulsed bone fragments, which was conducive to the operation [ 31 ]. Our study also found that the incision had little invasion to the soft tissue, and the incision along the transverse lines of the skin was more conducive to the beauty of the postoperative scar.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Either posteromedial, posterolateral, or posterior midline longitudinal incisions can be chosen. However, if the fracture fragment is large or skin injury is present in the incision area, transverse incision may be the optimal option, as suggested by Eren et al 11 , which can fully expose the fragments while reducing the incidence of wound complications. Since resistance to traction by the triceps surae is required, fixation with a single screw should be avoided.…”
Section: Surgical Attentions Of the Avulsion Fracture Of Calcaneal Tumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the optimal surgical technique remains a subject of debate as the available techniques continue to evolve. [6][7][8] Moreover, there is no theoretical basis for deciding which fixation method is more biomechanically relevant. Finite element analysis (FEM) is a method that is used to analyze dynamic and static physical systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%