2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11661-016-3578-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transverse and z-Direction CVN Impact Tests of X65 Line Pipe Steels of Two Centerline Segregation Ratings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…By contrast, the EBSD images (Figure a–c), the more serious is the centerline segregation in the continuous casting slab, the more inhomogeneity microstructure in the centerline region of strip, and the percentage of martensite/bainite in this area is higher. Our results are different with Su et al, who found the black belt in the centerline of steel strip rolled from slab Mannesmann class 2 is pearlite belt, and segregation band of strip corresponding to Mannesmann class 1.4 is composed of scattered islands of pearlite, and with the hardness of pearlite structure being ≈235 HV. In sample 1#, only polygonal ferrite and MA were observed.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By contrast, the EBSD images (Figure a–c), the more serious is the centerline segregation in the continuous casting slab, the more inhomogeneity microstructure in the centerline region of strip, and the percentage of martensite/bainite in this area is higher. Our results are different with Su et al, who found the black belt in the centerline of steel strip rolled from slab Mannesmann class 2 is pearlite belt, and segregation band of strip corresponding to Mannesmann class 1.4 is composed of scattered islands of pearlite, and with the hardness of pearlite structure being ≈235 HV. In sample 1#, only polygonal ferrite and MA were observed.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…However, the impact of different degrees of centerline segregation on mechanical properties of strip is not very clear. A few studies reported that the strips rolled from the slabs with serious segregation are more likely to yield lower value and greater variability in Charpy impact toughness. Collins et al reported two steels with Mannesmann rating of 2 and 3 showed minimal differences in mechanical properties, and even a steel with a Mannesmann rating of 3 easily meets X70 line pipe requirements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the variability in toughness in the same plate was caused by centerline segregation of the slab. This result is consistent with Su et al [22,23] who suggested that centerline segregation in continuously cast slabs increased variability in mechanical properties of steel plates.…”
Section: Low Temperature Toughnesssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…However, central carbon segregation along the casting direction occurs due to the carbon solubility difference between the liquid phase and solid phase, which can induce tremendous quality control issues in high-end steel products [1,2]. Moreover, this kind of defect is difficult to eliminate in reheating and rolling processes and will be left into the subsequent products, which will affect the tensile yield strength and low-temperature impact toughness [3,4]. Therefore, the control of central segregation along the casting direction is important to improve the quality stability of high-end steel products.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%