2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00975.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transvaginal, ultrasound‐guided, ovarian, interstitial laser treatment in anovulatory women with clomifene‐citrate‐resistant polycystic ovary syndrome

Abstract: Objective To assess the effectiveness of transvaginal, ultrasoundguided, ovarian, interstitial laser coagulation treatment in anovulatory women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS).Design A pilot study.Setting Assisted reproductive technology unit.Sample Twenty-three anovulatory women with clomifenecitrate-resistant PCOS.Methods Ultrasound-guided, transvaginal, ovarian, interstitial yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser treatment.Main outcome measures Serum luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(64 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The number of punctures have varied markedly between three and 25 per ovary with power settings between 30 and 400 W (2, 6). Such a wide range of puncture points made in an ovary with different outcomes in different studies can be explained by the variation in techniques used in laparoscopic ovarian diathermy, including [1] using different instruments (e.g., needles, scissors, biopsy forceps) to deliver the energy to the ovary; [2] applying a different amount of energy to the ovary (measured in joules, equivalent to power in watts multiplied by the duration of electricity applied in s per puncture); and [3] distribution of the thermal energy, either localized to a few holes or more widely spread over many holes with varying depths of penetration. Therefore, it is important that the comparison between different studies of laparoscopic ovarian diathermy should take into consideration the total amount of thermal energy delivered to each ovary, not just the number of holes made in the ovary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The number of punctures have varied markedly between three and 25 per ovary with power settings between 30 and 400 W (2, 6). Such a wide range of puncture points made in an ovary with different outcomes in different studies can be explained by the variation in techniques used in laparoscopic ovarian diathermy, including [1] using different instruments (e.g., needles, scissors, biopsy forceps) to deliver the energy to the ovary; [2] applying a different amount of energy to the ovary (measured in joules, equivalent to power in watts multiplied by the duration of electricity applied in s per puncture); and [3] distribution of the thermal energy, either localized to a few holes or more widely spread over many holes with varying depths of penetration. Therefore, it is important that the comparison between different studies of laparoscopic ovarian diathermy should take into consideration the total amount of thermal energy delivered to each ovary, not just the number of holes made in the ovary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The procedure of transvaginal ultrasound-guided ovarian interstitial laser treatment has been detailed previously (1). All participants were treated on the third day after P-induced bleeding.…”
Section: Techniques Of Ovarian Interstitial Laser Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some techniques of transvaginal ovarian drilling have been described in elegant studies [7,8], nevertheless a monopolar transvaginal ovarian cauterization, that use the expertise and safety of transvaginal puncture for oocyte captation [9], seems to be an easier and feasible approach [10]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a conclusion, although this new technique described by Zhu et al (1)(2)(3) seems to be a promising novel treatment method, it has not yet been investigated thoroughly, and further studies for its efficacy and safety should be undertaken.…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%