“…The discrepant results may be explained by differences in measurement technique, study design, the period in gestation studied, the statistical methods used, and the interpretation of the results. For example, in some studies 13,15,16,19,20,28 a correlation coefficient was used to describe changes in cervical length with gestational age. Only Gramellini et al 13 , Murakawa et al 20 and Brieger et al 15 reported a strong or moderate negative correlation between cervical length and gestational age (r = 0.92, P < 0.001, r = 0.4, P < 0.001 and σ = 0.6, P < 0.001) compared with the other studies 16,19,28 where the negative correlation was weak.…”