Transtibial pullout repair of the lateral meniscus posterior root tear combined with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction reduces lateral meniscus extrusion: A retrospective study
Abstract:Background: Lateral meniscus (LM) posterior root tears (PRT) are often associated with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and can result in rotational instability, joint overloading, and degenerative changes in the knee. Improved rotational stability and kinematics have been reported after LMPRT repair. However, it is unclear which repair technique can achieve the greatest reduction in lateral meniscus extrusion (LME).Hypothesis: We hypothesized that transtibial pullout repair would decrease LME to a grea… Show more
“…2,3,10,13,20,27,30 A critical issue for successful repair of tears of the LMPR is proper surgical technique, and meniscal extrusion is a common and objective outcome to measure postsurgical meniscal function. 1,15,18 Currently, there are 2 surgical techniques with clinical follow-up records. The side-toside technique can be used to repair radial tears with a root remnant of adequate tissue quality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,18,30 There were no significant reductions of coronal extrusion after LMPR repairs in all 3 studies, but 1 comparative study among them showed significantly greater decreases of coronal extrusion after pullout repairs than after side-to-side repairs. 18 In 2 studies repairing radial tears of the LMPR by the side-to-side suture technique, the sagittal extrusion increased in 1 study but decreased in the other. 2,30 The LMPR signal on follow-up MRI was reported in 2 studies.…”
Section: Radiographic Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Of the 469 articles initially identified by electronic searches, 9 studies were ultimately included ( Figure 2). Of the 9 studies included, 5 were retrospective cohort studies (level 3), 10,13,18,20,30 and the remaining 4 were case series (level 4). 2,3,27,32 The general features of each included study are summarized in Table 2.…”
Section: Literature Search and Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, 5 different functional scores were utilized (Table 2): the Lysholm score (7 studies 2,3,10,13,20,27,32 ), IKDC subjective score (6 studies 2,3,10,18,20,32 ), Tegner score (5 studies 3,10,13,27,32 ), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score (1 study 13 ), and 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) score (1 study 13 ). All but 1 of these studies showed significant improvements (P < .05) in each functional score at the final follow-up compared with the preoperative status (Table 5), including the mean Lysholm score (from 58.3 to 91.4), the mean IKDC subjective score (from 61.1 to 87.2), and the Tegner score (from 2.5 to 6.0).…”
Section: Clinical Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1 study, weightbearing AP radiographs showed no significant narrowing (0.04 mm) of lateral joint space width in patients undergoing side-to-side repairs for tears of the LMPR. 30 In another study, the chondral status on MRI scans after LMPR pullout repairs was rated as normal in 81% of patients, mild in 16% of patients, and moderate in 32 26 NA NA SSS Not needed Okazaki 18 8 HST DB SSS Not needed 9 HST DB POS ACL tunnel Pan 20 31 HST DB POS ACL tunnel LaPrade 13 10 NA NA POS Additional tunnel Krych 10 26 NA NA POS Additional tunnel a ACL, anterior cruciate ligament; BPTB, bone-patellar tendonbone; DB, double bundle; HST, hamstring tendon; LMPR, lateral meniscus posterior root; NA, not available; POS, pullout suture; SB, single bundle; SSS, side-to-side suture; TB, triple bundle. 3% patients, none of which was significantly different from their preoperative status.…”
Background: Clinical outcomes of surgical repairs for tears of the lateral meniscus posterior root (LMPR) in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) have not been comprehensively investigated. Purpose: To systematically review the clinical, radiographic, and arthroscopic results of surgical repairs for tears of the LMPR in patients undergoing ACLR. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A systematic electronic search of the PubMed and Embase databases was performed to identify studies reporting clinical, radiographic, or arthroscopic results of surgical repairs for tears of the LMPR in patients undergoing ACLR. Each included study was abstracted regarding study characteristics, patient characteristics, surgical technique, and outcome measures. The methodological quality of the included studies was analyzed according to the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) criteria. Results: Nine studies were included in this systematic review, representing a total of 215 knees in 215 patients. Overall, 123 side-to-side repairs and 89 pullout repairs were performed for tears of the LMPR during ACLR. After a mean follow-up of 33.9 months, significant improvements ( P < .05) were found in the mean Lysholm score (from 58.3 to 91.4) as well as the mean International Knee Documentation Committee subjective score (from 61.1 to 87.2). Weightbearing anteroposterior radiographs of 41 patients showed no significant narrowing of lateral joint space width. On magnetic resonance imaging scans, 31 patients demonstrated no significant progression of chondral lesions, and no significant decreases in meniscal extrusion on coronal planes were reported in another 76 patients. The complete/partial healing was 93.6% on second-look arthroscopy after side-to-side repairs for radial tears of the LMPR. The MINORS value showed a high risk of bias for all 9 studies. Conclusion: Patients with tears of the LMPR associated with ACL injuries achieved favorable functional scores after ACLR and LMPR repairs, and the side-to-side repair for radial tears of the LMPR succeeded in a high meniscal healing rate of >90%. However, the authors of this review were unable to definitively conclude whether LMPR repairs fully restore the hoop stress of the lateral meniscus.
“…2,3,10,13,20,27,30 A critical issue for successful repair of tears of the LMPR is proper surgical technique, and meniscal extrusion is a common and objective outcome to measure postsurgical meniscal function. 1,15,18 Currently, there are 2 surgical techniques with clinical follow-up records. The side-toside technique can be used to repair radial tears with a root remnant of adequate tissue quality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,18,30 There were no significant reductions of coronal extrusion after LMPR repairs in all 3 studies, but 1 comparative study among them showed significantly greater decreases of coronal extrusion after pullout repairs than after side-to-side repairs. 18 In 2 studies repairing radial tears of the LMPR by the side-to-side suture technique, the sagittal extrusion increased in 1 study but decreased in the other. 2,30 The LMPR signal on follow-up MRI was reported in 2 studies.…”
Section: Radiographic Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Of the 469 articles initially identified by electronic searches, 9 studies were ultimately included ( Figure 2). Of the 9 studies included, 5 were retrospective cohort studies (level 3), 10,13,18,20,30 and the remaining 4 were case series (level 4). 2,3,27,32 The general features of each included study are summarized in Table 2.…”
Section: Literature Search and Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, 5 different functional scores were utilized (Table 2): the Lysholm score (7 studies 2,3,10,13,20,27,32 ), IKDC subjective score (6 studies 2,3,10,18,20,32 ), Tegner score (5 studies 3,10,13,27,32 ), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score (1 study 13 ), and 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) score (1 study 13 ). All but 1 of these studies showed significant improvements (P < .05) in each functional score at the final follow-up compared with the preoperative status (Table 5), including the mean Lysholm score (from 58.3 to 91.4), the mean IKDC subjective score (from 61.1 to 87.2), and the Tegner score (from 2.5 to 6.0).…”
Section: Clinical Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1 study, weightbearing AP radiographs showed no significant narrowing (0.04 mm) of lateral joint space width in patients undergoing side-to-side repairs for tears of the LMPR. 30 In another study, the chondral status on MRI scans after LMPR pullout repairs was rated as normal in 81% of patients, mild in 16% of patients, and moderate in 32 26 NA NA SSS Not needed Okazaki 18 8 HST DB SSS Not needed 9 HST DB POS ACL tunnel Pan 20 31 HST DB POS ACL tunnel LaPrade 13 10 NA NA POS Additional tunnel Krych 10 26 NA NA POS Additional tunnel a ACL, anterior cruciate ligament; BPTB, bone-patellar tendonbone; DB, double bundle; HST, hamstring tendon; LMPR, lateral meniscus posterior root; NA, not available; POS, pullout suture; SB, single bundle; SSS, side-to-side suture; TB, triple bundle. 3% patients, none of which was significantly different from their preoperative status.…”
Background: Clinical outcomes of surgical repairs for tears of the lateral meniscus posterior root (LMPR) in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) have not been comprehensively investigated. Purpose: To systematically review the clinical, radiographic, and arthroscopic results of surgical repairs for tears of the LMPR in patients undergoing ACLR. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A systematic electronic search of the PubMed and Embase databases was performed to identify studies reporting clinical, radiographic, or arthroscopic results of surgical repairs for tears of the LMPR in patients undergoing ACLR. Each included study was abstracted regarding study characteristics, patient characteristics, surgical technique, and outcome measures. The methodological quality of the included studies was analyzed according to the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) criteria. Results: Nine studies were included in this systematic review, representing a total of 215 knees in 215 patients. Overall, 123 side-to-side repairs and 89 pullout repairs were performed for tears of the LMPR during ACLR. After a mean follow-up of 33.9 months, significant improvements ( P < .05) were found in the mean Lysholm score (from 58.3 to 91.4) as well as the mean International Knee Documentation Committee subjective score (from 61.1 to 87.2). Weightbearing anteroposterior radiographs of 41 patients showed no significant narrowing of lateral joint space width. On magnetic resonance imaging scans, 31 patients demonstrated no significant progression of chondral lesions, and no significant decreases in meniscal extrusion on coronal planes were reported in another 76 patients. The complete/partial healing was 93.6% on second-look arthroscopy after side-to-side repairs for radial tears of the LMPR. The MINORS value showed a high risk of bias for all 9 studies. Conclusion: Patients with tears of the LMPR associated with ACL injuries achieved favorable functional scores after ACLR and LMPR repairs, and the side-to-side repair for radial tears of the LMPR succeeded in a high meniscal healing rate of >90%. However, the authors of this review were unable to definitively conclude whether LMPR repairs fully restore the hoop stress of the lateral meniscus.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.