2021
DOI: 10.1111/codi.15930
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transrectal natural orifice specimen extraction in left hemicolectomy for tumours around the splenic flexure: Old wine in new bottles

Abstract: Aim: Laparoscopic anterior resection with natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) has favourable short-term outcomes. However, NOSE is rarely adopted for left hemicolectomy procedures. This study aimed to review the feasibility, safety and short-term outcomes of transrectal NOSE in patients undergoing laparoscopic left hemicolectomy. Method: All consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic left hemicolectomy surgery with transrectal NOSE in a single institution between January 2018 and December 2020 were… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the number of lymph nodes harvested on pathological examination was higher in the EA group than in the IA group, the difference was not statistically significant in our study (IA vs. EA: 25 vs. 32.2, p = 0.058). Similar to other studies, the mean numbers of harvested lymph nodes in both groups were higher than the recommended number (12). Notably, no previous study has compared the specimen length and the nearest margin to the tumor.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the number of lymph nodes harvested on pathological examination was higher in the EA group than in the IA group, the difference was not statistically significant in our study (IA vs. EA: 25 vs. 32.2, p = 0.058). Similar to other studies, the mean numbers of harvested lymph nodes in both groups were higher than the recommended number (12). Notably, no previous study has compared the specimen length and the nearest margin to the tumor.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…An opening was made in the upper rectum, and a wound protector was inserted to protect and shorten the rectum. After specimen retrieval, the rectal opening was closed by suturing, and an air leak test was performed to confirm that there was no mechanically insufficient suture [ 12 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the conventional surgery group, where specimen extraction was performed through a minilaparotomic wound, the specimen was removed either through a midline wound for EA or a Pfannenstiel incision for IA. In contrast, for the NOSE group, specimen extraction was carried out transrectally (25).…”
Section: Operative Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the conventional surgery group, where specimen extraction was performed through a mini-laparotomic wound, the specimen was removed either through a midline wound for EA or a Pfannenstiel incision for IA. In contrast, for the NOSE group, specimen extraction was carried out transrectally (25).…”
Section: Operative Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%