2006
DOI: 10.1038/nbt1221
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transposon-free insertions for insect genetic engineering

Abstract: Methods involving the release of transgenic insects in the field hold great promise for controlling vector-borne diseases and agricultural pests. Insect transformation depends on nonautonomous transposable elements as gene vectors. The resulting insertions are stable in the absence of suitable transposase, however, such absence cannot always be guaranteed. We describe a method for post-integration elimination of all transposon sequences in the pest insect Medfly, Ceratitis capitata. The resulting insertions la… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
65
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This obviates serious programmatic and ecological concerns for transgene instability, which would initially result in loss of desired transgene phenotypes, and then potentially, horizontal transmission of the transgene into unintended host species. The first mexfly transformation study also stabilized vectors, but by re-mobilizing both terminal sequences resulting in transposon-free transgene insertions (Condon et al 2007b;Dafa'alla et al 2006). However, these stabilized transgenes are more difficult to achieve, require another marker gene, and the practical need for post-integration deletion of both termini is not compelling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This obviates serious programmatic and ecological concerns for transgene instability, which would initially result in loss of desired transgene phenotypes, and then potentially, horizontal transmission of the transgene into unintended host species. The first mexfly transformation study also stabilized vectors, but by re-mobilizing both terminal sequences resulting in transposon-free transgene insertions (Condon et al 2007b;Dafa'alla et al 2006). However, these stabilized transgenes are more difficult to achieve, require another marker gene, and the practical need for post-integration deletion of both termini is not compelling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In these instances stability of the integrated transgene, such as the testis-speciWc 2tubulin-egfp transgene used for the separation of females from males in diVerent mosquito species (Catteruccia et al 2005;Smith et al 2007), would be an essential requisite in SIT programs where large numbers of mosquitoes need to be reared, sexed and released. Indeed a series of systems have been developed in Drosophila and other fruit Xies to achieve the stabilization of integrated transposons by removing one or both terminal inverted repeats (Handler et al 2004;Dafa'alla et al 2006). However, these systems require the development of a large number of transgenic lines and a high eYciency of remobilization of the transposon in use, neither of which at present represent a viable option in Anopheles or other mosquitoes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The consequence of such transgene-transposase exposure could be the remobilization of a transgene to another genomic location or total loss of a transgene from an insect's genome. Measures to avoid potential transgene remobilization in engineered dipterans such as postintegrational transgene modification to alter the transposon and achieve nonmobilization or stability has been demonstrated in D. melanogaster and C. capitata [86][87][88]. Other strategies that offer transgene stability are becoming available.…”
Section: Limitations Of Transgenic Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%