2021
DOI: 10.3390/ijms222413434
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transposable Prophages in Leptospira: An Ancient, Now Diverse, Group Predominant in Causative Agents of Weil’s Disease

Abstract: The virome associated with the corkscrew shaped bacterium Leptospira, responsible for Weil’s disease, is scarcely known, and genetic tools available for these bacteria remain limited. To reduce these two issues, potential transposable prophages were searched in Leptospiraceae genomes. The 236 predicted transposable prophages were particularly abundant in the most pathogenic leptospiral clade, being potentially involved in the acquisition of virulent traits. According to genomic similarities and phylogenies, th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(75 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of note, insertion sequence (IS) transposase-like CDSs were found at or near the boundaries of the rfb cluster ( Fig S4 and Table S5, fourth and fifth sheets). Genomic rearrangements involving inversions have been reported in other Leptospira species ( Nascimento et al, 2004 ; Olo Ndela et al, 2021 ), some of which are indeed IS-mediated ( Nascimento et al, 2004 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of note, insertion sequence (IS) transposase-like CDSs were found at or near the boundaries of the rfb cluster ( Fig S4 and Table S5, fourth and fifth sheets). Genomic rearrangements involving inversions have been reported in other Leptospira species ( Nascimento et al, 2004 ; Olo Ndela et al, 2021 ), some of which are indeed IS-mediated ( Nascimento et al, 2004 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final dataset consisted of 172 viral sequences, in total. All the proteins encoded in these sequences were categorized into OGs by a two‐step procedure as described in Olo Ndela et al (2021) and in the Supplementary Information (Section 1.2.2).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To identify all protein coding genes in these small genomes, including overlapping and overprinted ones, all ORFs of at least eighteen residues were identified in these forty-nine microvirus genomes using getorf from the EMBOSS suite ( Rice, Longden, and Bleasby 2000 ). The 4,719 identified ORFs were organized into orthologous groups (OGs) in a two-step procedure as in Olo Ndela, Enault, and Toussaint (2021) : (1) all proteins were compared to each other using MMseqs2 ( Steinegger and Söding 2017 ) (bit-score ≥50 and reciprocal coverage >70%) and clustered using MCL v14-137 ( Enright, Van Dongen, and Ouzounis 2002 ) (inflation 2.0); and (2) for each protein cluster, a multiple alignment was built using Clustal Omega ( Sievers et al. 2011 ) and transformed into an HMM profile and all profiles were compared to each other using HHsearch of the HH-suite toolkit ( Steinegger et al 2019 ) (version 2.0.16, cut-offs: probability ≥90% and coverage ≥50%).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%