2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-9074-0_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transposable Elements: Classification, Identification, and Their Use As a Tool For Comparative Genomics

Abstract: Most genomes are populated by hundreds of thousands of sequences originated from mobile elements. On the one hand, these sequences present a real challenge in the process of genome analysis and annotation. On the other hand, they are very interesting biological subjects involved in many cellular processes. Here we present an overview of transposable elements biodiversity, and we discuss different approaches to transposable elements detection and analyses.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
57
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 148 publications
1
57
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, this may be a novel event distinct from standard DNA rearrangement events such as transposition and recombination. This is also evident from the fact that it is a 38-amino acids small predicted protein coded by 117 nucleotides in the 2019-nCoV genome, while transposons and insertion sequences are much longer sequences, characterized by sizes ranging from 700 bp to several thousands bp (1). Even there is no possibility of occurence of long terminal repeat sequences, since the ORF10 protein or nucleotide sequence is not a repetitive sequence as observed from GenBank sequence accession number MT106054.1/RefSeq sequence NC_045512.2 harbouring sequences from two different human sources, and there are no flanking repeated sequences, either.…”
Section: Open Reading Frame 10 (Orf10) May Be the Reason For Contagiomentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Hence, this may be a novel event distinct from standard DNA rearrangement events such as transposition and recombination. This is also evident from the fact that it is a 38-amino acids small predicted protein coded by 117 nucleotides in the 2019-nCoV genome, while transposons and insertion sequences are much longer sequences, characterized by sizes ranging from 700 bp to several thousands bp (1). Even there is no possibility of occurence of long terminal repeat sequences, since the ORF10 protein or nucleotide sequence is not a repetitive sequence as observed from GenBank sequence accession number MT106054.1/RefSeq sequence NC_045512.2 harbouring sequences from two different human sources, and there are no flanking repeated sequences, either.…”
Section: Open Reading Frame 10 (Orf10) May Be the Reason For Contagiomentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Reverse transcription is followed by reintegration into the host genome. Through the copy and paste mechanism of transposition, Class I elements are the main source of increased repetitive fractions, thereby having a major impact in large genomes [ 153 , 154 , 155 ]. Class I mobile elements are composed of long terminal repeat (LTR) and non-LTR subclasses.…”
Section: Mobile Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Mobile genetic element classification based on transposition mechanisms (according to Wicker et al [ 153 ]). The main structural components of the elements are reported on the right (modified from Makalowsky et al [ 155 ]). …”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, they would provide a valuable and complementary set of genetic markers to analyze neutral and adaptive population structure in both basic and applied studies. However, with the exception of targeted candidate genes studies, CNV genotyping remained expensive for a long time as it required whole genome sequencing data with deep coverage (Pirooznia et al 2015, Makałowski et al 2019, precluding the use of these markers in population genomic studies that involve thousands of samples from dozens of populations. This situation has recently changed through the development of a novel methodological approach allowing the identification of CNVs in a cost-effective way using RAD-seq data (McKinney et al 2017, Dorant et al 2020.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%