2012
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.400
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transposable elements and viruses as factors in adaptation and evolution: an expansion and strengthening of theTE‐Thrust hypothesis

Abstract: In addition to the strong divergent evolution and significant and episodic evolutionary transitions and speciation we previously attributed to TE-Thrust, we have expanded the hypothesis to more fully account for the contribution of viruses to TE-Thrust and evolution. The concept of symbiosis and holobiontic genomes is acknowledged, with particular emphasis placed on the creativity potential of the union of retroviral genomes with vertebrate genomes. Further expansions of the TE-Thrust hypothesis are proposed r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
69
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 217 publications
3
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…through unequal crossing over), and thus impact gross genomic architecture [3]. While this may often be deleterious to individuals, the ability of TEs to bring about fast genomic changes might at times contribute to adaptation and diversification [4][5][6][7][8]. For example, TE activity may accelerate speciation by causing genomic incompatibilities between incipient species [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…through unequal crossing over), and thus impact gross genomic architecture [3]. While this may often be deleterious to individuals, the ability of TEs to bring about fast genomic changes might at times contribute to adaptation and diversification [4][5][6][7][8]. For example, TE activity may accelerate speciation by causing genomic incompatibilities between incipient species [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A thought-provoking fact in this context is the total refractoriness of naked-mole rats to develop cancer [99]: strikingly, the genome of these rats has an unusually low content in retroelements (25%, compared to 40% and 45% of murine and human genomes, respectively) and, most importantly, none of their transposable element is viable [100]. It is tempting to attribute the amazing privilege of cancer resistance to the inactive state of the RT-mediated machinery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, TEs have been key contributors to evolution (Biemont 2010; Oliver et al 2013; Kapusta et al 2017) and led the insurgences of the V(D)J system of acquired immunity (Kapitonov and Jurka 2005; Koonin and Krupovic 2014) and mammalian placenta (Lynch et al 2011). Given their huge impact on shaping genomes, TEs are also thought to influence differentiation (Huff et al 2016) and speciation as proposed by the Epi-Transposon (Zeh et al 2009), CArrier SubPopulation (Jurka et al 2011), and TE-Thrust (Oliver and Greene 2012) hypotheses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%