2021
DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyab024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transportation noise and risk of stroke: a nationwide prospective cohort study covering Denmark

Abstract: Background Studies on transportation noise and incident stroke are few and inconclusive. We aimed to investigate associations between road-traffic and railway noise and the risk of incident stroke in the entire Danish population. Methods We estimated road-traffic and railway noise (Lden) at the most and least exposed façades for all residential addresses across Denmark (2.8 million) for the period 1990–2017. Based on this, we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also modeled 10-y mean L den max and L den min exposures as categorical variables, with adjustment for Model 2 covariates. For road traffic noise, we estimated HRs for categorical exposures representing 3-dB exposure increments (corresponding to a doubling of acoustical energy) relative to reference categories of 35-< 45 dB for road L den max and 35-< 40 dB for road L den min, consistent with previous studies (Sørensen et al 2021b;Thacher et al 2021). For railway noise, we estimated HRs for 3-dB exposure categories (ranging from 35-< 38 to ≥70 dB for rail L den max, and 35-< 38 to ≥65 dB for rail L den min) relative to no exposure (i.e., using participants who had no railway noise exposure during the 10-y period as the reference group).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…We also modeled 10-y mean L den max and L den min exposures as categorical variables, with adjustment for Model 2 covariates. For road traffic noise, we estimated HRs for categorical exposures representing 3-dB exposure increments (corresponding to a doubling of acoustical energy) relative to reference categories of 35-< 45 dB for road L den max and 35-< 40 dB for road L den min, consistent with previous studies (Sørensen et al 2021b;Thacher et al 2021). For railway noise, we estimated HRs for 3-dB exposure categories (ranging from 35-< 38 to ≥70 dB for rail L den max, and 35-< 38 to ≥65 dB for rail L den min) relative to no exposure (i.e., using participants who had no railway noise exposure during the 10-y period as the reference group).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 55%
“… 61 In agreement with our findings, a recent nationwide Danish study found road traffic noise to increase the risk of incident stroke, whereas no clear associations were observed for railway noise. 62 Studies on exposure to transportation noise and stroke are not, however, consistent, 63 64 thus indicating a need for further studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the study had only 13 ischaemic and 21 haemorrhagic exposed cases. Notably, studies on transportation noise have also found positive associations with ischaemic stroke (and not haemorrhagic stroke),21 22 37 and with pathophysiological risk factors for ischaemic stroke including subclinical atherosclerosis and impaired endothelial function 5. This suggests the involvement of noise in causing vascular damage, and may provide a pathophysiological basis to explain the higher risk of ischaemic stroke in relation to occupational noise exposure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%