1996
DOI: 10.1177/0361198196155200112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transportation, Congestion, and Density: New Insights

Abstract: Part of the case for higher density development is based on the belief that compact urban forms are more efficient than low density development known as suburban sprawl. Some broad relationships among driving, transit use, urban form, and congestion using urban area data, and special analysis of the 1990 National Personal Transportation Survey are examined. Although generally supporting the prevailing wisdom, the regional data show that there are other factors involved in explaining such differences, and the n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The idea of ''proper city densities'' (Jacobs 1961, 221) has been the subject of debate in planning theory and practice for quite some time, although its relationship with physical activity is a more recent topic of discussion and theorization. The TRB Report ( 2005) cites a US study by Dunphy and Fisher (1996), which indicates that the total number of trips does decline (slightly) with density, while there is an increase in trips by public transport, walking, cycling, and taxi. This study showed trip share by walking and cycling increased markedly above densities of 7,500 people per square mile (original author's units).…”
Section: Part 2: the Built Environment And Health A Review Of The Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea of ''proper city densities'' (Jacobs 1961, 221) has been the subject of debate in planning theory and practice for quite some time, although its relationship with physical activity is a more recent topic of discussion and theorization. The TRB Report ( 2005) cites a US study by Dunphy and Fisher (1996), which indicates that the total number of trips does decline (slightly) with density, while there is an increase in trips by public transport, walking, cycling, and taxi. This study showed trip share by walking and cycling increased markedly above densities of 7,500 people per square mile (original author's units).…”
Section: Part 2: the Built Environment And Health A Review Of The Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such findings are not surprising. Research on the subject of walking has consistently found that higher residential densities and the presence of mixed land uses are associated with increased rates of walking (Cervero 1989;Cervero and Kockelman 1997;Dunphy and Fisher 1996;Frank and Pivo 1994). From a functional perspective, however, what matters is not simply that communities are dense or contain multiple land uses but that meaningful destinations are located within walking distance from where older adults live, preferably with sidewalks and intersections that permit them to walk there safely (Cambridge Systematics 1994;Cervero, 1996;Cervero and Gorham 1995;Friedman, Gordon, and Peers 1994;Handy 1996;Kitamura, Laidet, and Mokhtarian 1997;Lund 2003).…”
Section: Shifts To Walkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Minnesota, VMT reductions are slated to play a more prominent role, contributing to 14% of the state's GHG-reduction targets by 2025 (Boies et al, 2008). Such estimates are informed by the work of researchers like Bailey et al (2008), Chatman (2003), Dunphy and Fisher (1996), Holtzclaw (1994), and Holtzclaw et al (2002), who show respectable elasticities (on the order of À0X30) between urban densities and VMT. Density combined with rail transit investments, some suggest, could yield even greater dividends: Brown et al (2008), for instance, estimated that America's densest metropolitan areas and those with mature railway networks are the lowest carbon emitters per capita.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%