Transportation and Land Use

Abstract

Communities benefit when decisions about transportation and land use are made at the same time. Deciding to build houses, schools, grocery stores, employment centers, and transit stations close to one another-while providing a well-connected street network and facilities for walking or biking-provides more transportation choices and convenient access to daily activities. It also ensures community resources and services are used efficiently. Benefits include: Build in transportation choices, convenience, and access. While cars are often the most popular form

A Critical Reflection on Housing Market Area Definition in England

“…This framework illustrates how, under conditions of perfect competition, the household chooses its residential location to maximise its utility, balancing the costs of location against the advantages of cheaper land with increasing distance from the centre where employment is assumed to be concentrated (Alonso, 1964;Wingo, 1961). The access-space model assumes that, in travelling to the centre of the city, the household bears higher transport costs but is compensated by lower housing costs, meaning that the household trades off housing costs with transport costs.…”

Public and Subsidized Housing as a Platform for Becoming a United States Citizen*

“…The percent of housing built before 1940, a general control for housing quality, has an alternating sign pattern, so yields no meaningful interpretation. But the percent of workers who commute 45 minutes or more to get to their job has a consistent negative influence on the probability of naturalization, indicating that commuting, a major—and often stressful (see, e.g., Frumkin, Frank, and Jackson, 2004; Ewing et al, 2011)—time sink, acts as an impediment 35 . The locational characteristics category reveals that individuals living farther from CBSA centers—in more suburban, exurban, and/or rural locations—have a higher probability of naturalizing but, at the same time, that density (the inverse of distance from the nearest census tract) increases the probability of naturalization, perhaps by enhancing network effects.…”

Connecting Regional Governance, Urban Form, and Energy Use: Opportunities and Limitations

“…Among state-level initiatives, the state of California recently passed legislation, SB 375, aimed at redesigning the built environment of communities through regional coordination to reduce energy consumption. In this framework, municipalities are expected to work together on regional land use plans that provide a wider range of transportation and housing choice to residents [72,73]. As an example of a state-level mandate 1,2 , this legislation attempts to use regional MPOs more proactively, matching transportation investments to a normative vision of future land use in contrast to what has in the past been a reactive process [74].…”