1985
DOI: 10.1109/tns.1985.4333956
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transportable Charge in a Periodic Alternating Gradient System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although an accurate numerical solution for the beam envelope radii is easily obtained for specified beam and quadrupole lattice parameters, approximate analytical solutions continue to be useful for design studies, scaling, cost optimization, and physical understanding. Various analytical methods have been applied to solve these equations during the last twenty five years [3,4,5,6,7], with the degree of error decreasing from about 10% for the early smooth limit approximation to less than 1 % using the small parameter expansions employed by Anderson [6] and Lee [7]. In the present work the error is reduced to less than 0.1% for typical system parameters, but one may question the vdue of this new work since several approximations have been made in deriving the K-V equations, which may produce errors much larger than 0.1%, These approximations include the neglect of third order geometric abeaatians, non-linear components of quadrupole fringe fields, higher order magnetic multipoles, and deviations fiom the assumed flat space charge profile.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although an accurate numerical solution for the beam envelope radii is easily obtained for specified beam and quadrupole lattice parameters, approximate analytical solutions continue to be useful for design studies, scaling, cost optimization, and physical understanding. Various analytical methods have been applied to solve these equations during the last twenty five years [3,4,5,6,7], with the degree of error decreasing from about 10% for the early smooth limit approximation to less than 1 % using the small parameter expansions employed by Anderson [6] and Lee [7]. In the present work the error is reduced to less than 0.1% for typical system parameters, but one may question the vdue of this new work since several approximations have been made in deriving the K-V equations, which may produce errors much larger than 0.1%, These approximations include the neglect of third order geometric abeaatians, non-linear components of quadrupole fringe fields, higher order magnetic multipoles, and deviations fiom the assumed flat space charge profile.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Motivated by these limiting case results, for present purposes of analyzing leading order effects, we take F i = 0 and neglect image charge corrections. Results in the literature [19,11] can also be applied to calculate more elaborate image charge corrections.…”
Section: Core-particle Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Double-Helix Quadrupole (DHQ) Analysis The double-helix quadruple (DHQ) whose geometry is shown in Figure 6 has been described in Reference [2]. This magnet achieves a quadrupole field by the sinusoidal modulation of the axial position, z, of the turns in pairs of solenoid type coils according to the relationz (8) = h8 + An sin n8 where h is the helical advance per turn, An is the amplitude of the 27t modulation and n is the modulation frequency (n = 2 for the quadrupole.)…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%