2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00396-004-1136-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transport properties of alkyltrimethylammonium bromide surfactants in aqueous solutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
40
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
12
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fraction of bound counterions for the simulated system, calculated from the number of Br ions within the first peak of the N-Br RDF, was 0.61. This is close to, but somewhat lower than, several experimental estimates [37][38][39][40][41][42].…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 65%
“…The fraction of bound counterions for the simulated system, calculated from the number of Br ions within the first peak of the N-Br RDF, was 0.61. This is close to, but somewhat lower than, several experimental estimates [37][38][39][40][41][42].…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 65%
“…(26) is based on the assumption that cmc is the concentration where addition of one surfactant has 50 % probability of ending up in a micelle ((dS mic /dS T )=(dS/dS T )=0.5)). For C 12 TAB with a cmc value of 15.34 mM and an aggregation number of 55 [140], we obtain log(K mic )=95 and, consequently, the concentrations of various species present can be computed and are presented in Figure 4.…”
Section: Accepted M Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of ionic surfactant-based solutions, electrical conductivity has been successfully used for determination of critical micelle concentration and degree of counter ion dissociation of micelles [138][139][140], or in the case of multicomponent systems, such as polymer-surfactant or multivalent salt-surfactant, polymer saturation points [141] and critical aggregation concentrations (see, e.g., [142]). That is, even in systems where the interpretation becomes rather complicated as a consequence of multiple contributions for the overall ionic conductance, electrical conductivity measurements may discriminate between structural or configurational changes as a consequence of counterions release (or charge neutralization followed by structural re-arrangements) or by significant changes in the size of ionic species.…”
Section: Accepted M Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fraction of counter-ions bound to the micelle was determined conductometrically by the slope ratio method, a well proclaimed method used in the past by us and others [25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. In this method, the ratio of the pre and the post micellar slopes, S 1 and S 2 , respectively of the specific conductance versus concentration plots are considered.…”
Section: Counter-ion Bindingmentioning
confidence: 99%