2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssi.2009.08.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transport properties and defect analysis of La1.9Sr0.1NiO4+δ

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
28
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2. The doping of lanthanum sites by copper leads to the formation of pure phases with a K 2 NiF 4 structure, in agreement with several studies [8][9][10][25][26][27][28]. It is likely that cupric ions replace lanthanum sites and create additional sites displacement, which improves the electrical conductivity.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…2. The doping of lanthanum sites by copper leads to the formation of pure phases with a K 2 NiF 4 structure, in agreement with several studies [8][9][10][25][26][27][28]. It is likely that cupric ions replace lanthanum sites and create additional sites displacement, which improves the electrical conductivity.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This is consistent with the finding that the values of 2DS become smaller for higher d (Fig. 7b and c) 19 The concentration of oxygen vacancies is considered negligible here. The following pseudo-chemical reaction shows the equilibrium between oxygen interstitials, electron holes, and the surrounding oxygen gas molecules.…”
Section: Shown Insupporting
confidence: 93%
“…As a first order approximation, the deviation is assumed to be a linear function of the oxygen non-stoichiometry, d. 16,19 DG ex = 2RTlnc 1 c 2 2 M ad…”
Section: Shown Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As stated before, D (or δ) is reported to depend on P O2 by a factor around or less than 1/6. 23,40 Therefore, oxygen dependency from the surface exchange reaction part needs to be over 1/2 to yield the measured values of 1/3∼1/2. Step 2 O ads + e ↔ O − ads n = 3/8 [ 5 ] Step 3…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%