2004
DOI: 10.1002/iroh.200310662
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transport of Algal Cells in Hyporheic Sediments of the River Elbe (Germany)

Abstract: The advective transport of algal cells into the interstices of the hyporheic zone of the River Elbe was spatially and temporally heterogenous. Even deep sediment layers were reached by large phytoplankton species. Therefore, it is suggested that (i) the advective interstitial transport patterns vary between different algal sizes and morphotypes and (ii) sediment characteristics, expressed by the permeability coefficient k f of porous media, affect retention and retardation of surface water algae during subsurf… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…suffered little trichome breakage (1 to 2 cells per trichome) and were less likely to be retained by the filtration step than longer trichomed genera. This observation is supported by the findings of Kloep and Röske (2004) in their column filtration study with four green algae. They found that advective interstitial transport through granular medium depended primarily on algal size and morphotype.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…suffered little trichome breakage (1 to 2 cells per trichome) and were less likely to be retained by the filtration step than longer trichomed genera. This observation is supported by the findings of Kloep and Röske (2004) in their column filtration study with four green algae. They found that advective interstitial transport through granular medium depended primarily on algal size and morphotype.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Such differences are likely due in part to the spatial differences in near‐bed hydrodynamic conditions observed in the study, which would affect particle resuspension and deposition (Arnon et al, ) and the permeability of sediments (Cooper et al, ; Huettel & Rusch, ). The entry of particles into the interstitial zone is affected by the size of the riverbed sediments, and smaller particles tend to be retained (Karwan & Saiers, ); this is exacerbated by algae, which facilitate particle adhesion and may in turn lower riverbed permeability (Jones et al, ; Kloep & Röske, ). Small spherically shaped algae such as Chlorella enter interstitial pores more readily than algae with complex elongate shapes such as Scenedesmus colonies (Kloep & Röske, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The entry of particles into the interstitial zone is affected by the size of the riverbed sediments, and smaller particles tend to be retained (Karwan & Saiers, ); this is exacerbated by algae, which facilitate particle adhesion and may in turn lower riverbed permeability (Jones et al, ; Kloep & Röske, ). Small spherically shaped algae such as Chlorella enter interstitial pores more readily than algae with complex elongate shapes such as Scenedesmus colonies (Kloep & Röske, ). It is likely that some algae enter the streambed in the high flow areas upstream of bedforms as well as in nonbedform areas and are advected in the pore water flow downstream; others are scoured and resuspended due to bed shear stress ( τ ) and transported in the river (Bona et al, ; Boncagni et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Production of bacteria or algae within the biofilm can then be transferred to biofilmdwelling consumers (Weitere et al, 2005a;Norf et al, 2009a,b). Additionally, planktonic algae can be transferred into sediment interstices, where they may serve as a food source for riverine biofilms (Fischer & Pusch, 2001;Kloep & Roeske, 2004). However, the role of consumers in directly importing organic carbon into the biofilm food web has rarely been considered Kathol et al, 2009).…”
Section: Significant Grazing Impact Of Biofilm-dwelling Consumers On mentioning
confidence: 99%