2002
DOI: 10.1002/aic.690480521
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transport in heterogeneous media: Tracer dynamics in complex flow networks

Abstract: Large-scale inhomogeneities in natural porous

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If hyporheic exchange is active, on the other hand, the flow of water across the sediment–water interface will presumably preclude, or sweep away, the concentration boundary layer, in which case the mass transfer bottleneck is solely hyporheic exchange. The “either/or” nature of these two transport processes is consistent with a parallel arrangement of their respective mass transfer resistors (Figure ): R = true( 1 R stream + 1 R hypo true) 1 Equation implies that mass transport at the sediment–water interface will take the path of “least resistance”, depending on the nature of turbulence above the interface ( u *, U ∞ ,δ,υ), biophysical properties of the sediment bed including porosity (θ) and permeability ( K ), interfacial roughness (roughness scale k s ), and the molecular diffusion coefficient of the tracer ( D m ). If hyporheic exchange is negligible (e.g., because sediment hydraulic conductivity falls below the threshold of ∼1 m day –1 ), then R hypo → ∞ and mass transport is dominated by streamside exchange, R ≈ R stream .…”
Section: Turbulent Mass Transfer Across the Sediment–water Interfacementioning
confidence: 62%
“…If hyporheic exchange is active, on the other hand, the flow of water across the sediment–water interface will presumably preclude, or sweep away, the concentration boundary layer, in which case the mass transfer bottleneck is solely hyporheic exchange. The “either/or” nature of these two transport processes is consistent with a parallel arrangement of their respective mass transfer resistors (Figure ): R = true( 1 R stream + 1 R hypo true) 1 Equation implies that mass transport at the sediment–water interface will take the path of “least resistance”, depending on the nature of turbulence above the interface ( u *, U ∞ ,δ,υ), biophysical properties of the sediment bed including porosity (θ) and permeability ( K ), interfacial roughness (roughness scale k s ), and the molecular diffusion coefficient of the tracer ( D m ). If hyporheic exchange is negligible (e.g., because sediment hydraulic conductivity falls below the threshold of ∼1 m day –1 ), then R hypo → ∞ and mass transport is dominated by streamside exchange, R ≈ R stream .…”
Section: Turbulent Mass Transfer Across the Sediment–water Interfacementioning
confidence: 62%
“…Connected compartments can also be inserted to blend in dead regions with mass transfer or flow. Elaborate assemblages of reactor elements have been proposed to describe heterogeneous mixing (Başaǧaoǧlu et al, 2002). The two-mode model (Chakraborty and Balakotaiah, 2002) is a more sophisticated approach that involves coupled balance equations for the mixing-cup and spatially averaged concentrations, and the exchange between these two modes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these models, the storage zones are assumed to be arranged in parallel leading to concurrent hyporheic and surface storage dynamics. Using mathematically similar sets of equations and the idea of flow elements/reactors arranged in series or in parallel, Basagaoglu et al [2002] outline methods to describe tracer transport in heterogeneous porous media in the presence of complex flow networks. Kadlec [1994] used similar methods to describe lithium tracer transport in a free water surface wetland.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%