2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118387
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transport characteristics of liquid-gas interface in a capillary membrane pore

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure shows the separation mechanism of the mushroom chitin membrane, especially for the oil/water emulsion filtration. Previous studies hinted that pore geometries play an important role in oil/water separation and pore size distribution measurements since pore geometries govern the initial liquid wetting critical for separation and pore characterization. In this research, we also propose that the tortuous pore structures and wider pore size distribution created by freeze-thaw treatments affect the separation performance of the mushroom chitin membranes. Due to chitin’s complex pore structure and hydrophilic nature, mushroom chitin membranes show good separation performance and reusability.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Figure shows the separation mechanism of the mushroom chitin membrane, especially for the oil/water emulsion filtration. Previous studies hinted that pore geometries play an important role in oil/water separation and pore size distribution measurements since pore geometries govern the initial liquid wetting critical for separation and pore characterization. In this research, we also propose that the tortuous pore structures and wider pore size distribution created by freeze-thaw treatments affect the separation performance of the mushroom chitin membranes. Due to chitin’s complex pore structure and hydrophilic nature, mushroom chitin membranes show good separation performance and reusability.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The water contact angles of the B-PI, 6F-PI, and P-PI membranes were 103.8°, 94.0°, and 94.9°, respectively, whereas the DES contact angles of the corresponding ones were 74.3°, 68.8°, and 70.9°, respectively (Figure c). A lower contact angle generally indicates higher affinity and surface energy and a greater tendency for DES/water to wet the membrane, which might contribute to the swelling phenomena in the PI membranes. , Smaller contact angle was found in the DES than in aqueous system, indicating that the PI membranes had a better affinity to DES than water, as a result of the large amount of hydrogen bonding networks in the DES system …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A lower contact angle generally indicates higher affinity and surface energy and a greater tendency for DES/water to wet the membrane, which might contribute to the swelling phenomena in the PI membranes. 43,44 Smaller contact angle was found in the DES than in aqueous system, indicating that the PI membranes had a better affinity to DES than water, as a result of the large amount of hydrogen bonding networks in the DES system. 45 The rejection and antifouling properties of the membranes are closely related to surface charge.…”
Section: Membrane Morphology and Porementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various analytical methods are adopted by several researchers to determine the pore size distribution of the membranes. [50][51][52][53][54] In the present work, surface pore area distribution and pore diameter of untreated and plasma treated membranes is investigated using the Barett-Joyner-Halenda (BJH) method at 77k (Model: Quantachrome iQautosorb analyzer, Anton-Paar, India).…”
Section: Pore Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%