1985
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3468(85)80050-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transpleural repair of esophageal atresia without a primary gastrostomy: 240 patients treated between 1951 and 1983

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
16
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
4
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in our series, the incidence of CHD was similar in all EA types. The MCHD diagnosed in our series (Table 2) had a distribution similar to that in other series [15][16][17][18][19][20]. Our prevalence of MCHD (52%) was similar to that published by Spitz [4] and the distribution of the clinical material among the three groups and the mortality in each one was comparable as well ( Table 3).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…However, in our series, the incidence of CHD was similar in all EA types. The MCHD diagnosed in our series (Table 2) had a distribution similar to that in other series [15][16][17][18][19][20]. Our prevalence of MCHD (52%) was similar to that published by Spitz [4] and the distribution of the clinical material among the three groups and the mortality in each one was comparable as well ( Table 3).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Moreover, major pleural tears during dissection were not met in any case and only minor tears were reported in 4 cases only and this didn't affect the postoperative outcome. Anastomotic leaks were reported to occur in 14-21% of patients with EA [8,[15][16][17]. Our 16% incidence of anastomotic leak falls within the same range.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Forty-two patients (46%) had other congenital malformations besides their EA. The distribution of the 5 types of atresia as described by Gross [16] is the same as in other large studies [17,18].…”
Section: Patient Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 68%