2015
DOI: 10.1111/ajt.13260
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transplanting Kidneys from Deceased Donors With Severe Acute Kidney Injury

Abstract: Our aim was to determine outcomes with transplanting kidneys from deceased donors with acute kidney injury, defined as a donor with terminal serum creatinine ≥2.0 mg/dL, or a donor requiring acute renal replacement therapy. We included all patients who received deceased donor kidney transplant from June 2004 to October 2013. There were 162 AKI donor transplant recipients (21% of deceased donor transplants): 139 in the standard criteria donor (SCD) and 23 in the expanded criteria donor (ECD) cohort. 71% of the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

13
227
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(244 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
13
227
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Twenty-two of 61 in the GFT group had both preimplantation and postreperfusion biopsies performed: 18 showed GFT on both biopsies, 3 had GFT on postreperfusion biopsy only and 1 had GFT on the preimplantation biopsy only. The median for the number of glomeruli in the reperfusion biopsies was 15 (25-75% range: [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] in the GFT group and 14 (25-75% range: 10-21) in the control group (p ¼ 0.87).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Twenty-two of 61 in the GFT group had both preimplantation and postreperfusion biopsies performed: 18 showed GFT on both biopsies, 3 had GFT on postreperfusion biopsy only and 1 had GFT on the preimplantation biopsy only. The median for the number of glomeruli in the reperfusion biopsies was 15 (25-75% range: [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] in the GFT group and 14 (25-75% range: 10-21) in the control group (p ¼ 0.87).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mean serum creatinine concentration was 2.41 ± 0.88 mg/dL at time of procurement and 1.06 ± 0.32 mg/dL on admission in AKI donors, and 0.81 ± 0.26 mg/dL in controls (Table 1). AKI donors had a lower 24-h urine production (3.22 ± 1.95 vs. 4.59 ± 2.53 L, p = 0.009), were more frequently exposed [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] days in controls, p = 0.05) ( Table 3). While significant elevations in serum creatinine were noted in these patients until 10 days after transplantation, this difference lost statistical significance by day 14 (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in the last 10 years, case reports and large case series have been published and clinical practice has been changing, i.e., AKI kidneys from wellselected DBDs can successfully be used for transplantation [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. Specifically, two recent large studies deserve to be highlighted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increased incidence of delayed graft function (DGF)[3,4] is a significant disadvantage of using kidneys from AKI donors. This can lead to increased hospital stay and cost of treatment or even worse allograft function[5] when compare with KT from SCD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can lead to increased hospital stay and cost of treatment or even worse allograft function[5] when compare with KT from SCD. In addition, it is uncertain whether KT from AKI donor is associated with increased risk of acute rejection or allograft loss when compare with KT from using kidney from standard deceased donor[3,4]. Since AKI can occur from different causes and have different severities, the outcomes of KT from donors with AKI may be varied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%