“…Islets transplanted into the epididymal fat produced similar results to islets transplanted intraportally, although encapsulation or tissue‐engineered strategies are required (Buitinga et al, ; Manzoli et al, ; D. Mao et al, ; Rios, Zhang, Luo, & Shea, ; K. Wang, Wang, Han, Chen, & Luo, ; X. Wang, Wang, Zhang, Qiang, & Luo, ; Weaver et al, ). - The renal subcapsular space has been considered one of the best sites for islet transplantation for more than 3 decades (Mellgren, Schnell Landström, Petersson, & Andersson, ) and is used as a positive control in most studies instead of the liver (Ar’Rajab, Ahrén, Alumets, Lögdberg, & Bengmark, ; Halberstadt et al, ; Medarova et al, ; Pepper et al, ). Compared to intraportally transplanted islets, renal subcapsular islet grafts show a faster vascular engraftment that increases success rates (Olsson, Olerud, Pettersson, & Carlsson, ; Stokes et al, ). Nevertheless, several physiological and anatomical concerns (such as poor blood supply or reduced space to home islet grafts) make the transplantation of islets into the renal subcapsular space a nonfeasible option in humans.
- The spleen has been considered an alternative to the liver for islet transplantation since the 1970s (Koncz, Zimmerman, DeLellis & Davidoff, ), and several studies comparing the results of islet transplantation performed in the spleen and in the liver were published in that decade (Feldman et al, ; Kolb, Ruckert, Largiadèr, & Largiadèr, ; Reckard, Franklin, & Schulak, ; D. E. Sutherland, Frenzel, Payne, Matas, & Najarian, ).
…”