1999
DOI: 10.1136/gut.45.5.783
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transplantation of haemochromatosis liver and intestine into a normal recipient

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[30][31][32][33][34][35] In five of six studies, iron has not reaccumulated in the hepatic allograft, suggesting the primary defect in HHC does not reside in the liver. Thus, patients with HHC undergoing OLT are potentially at risk for iron reaccumulation in the new liver, possibly because of persistently high intestinal iron absorption or through redistribution of excess iron from other tissues into the liver.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[30][31][32][33][34][35] In five of six studies, iron has not reaccumulated in the hepatic allograft, suggesting the primary defect in HHC does not reside in the liver. Thus, patients with HHC undergoing OLT are potentially at risk for iron reaccumulation in the new liver, possibly because of persistently high intestinal iron absorption or through redistribution of excess iron from other tissues into the liver.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hepatic hemosiderosis resolved in 5 of 7 recipients who received livers from donors with HH. In the 2 cases where iron overload persisted, there were other explanations, such as multiple blood transfusions in the perioperative period and severe, recurrent allograft infection with hepatitis C. In addition, iron overload persisted and required subsequent venesection in a recipient of a combined liver and intestine transplant from a donor who was homozygous for C282Y 5. In contrast, most but not all studies of patients undergoing OLT for HH have not observed iron deposition in the hepatic allograft 4.…”
Section: Commentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These cases are listed in Table 3. In only 2 cases was HFE gene testing performed to confirm that the donor was homozygous for C282Y and the recipient did not have a C282Y mutation (Abdulkarim et al 69 and Adams et al 67 ). In 5 of the 7 cases, iron did not reaccumulate in the hepatic explant over a follow-up period that ranged from 6 to 29 months.…”
Section: Transplantation Of a Hemochromatosis Donor Livermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 5 of the 7 cases, iron did not reaccumulate in the hepatic explant over a follow-up period that ranged from 6 to 29 months. 41,[64][65][66][67] This suggests that the primary defect in HHC does not reside in the liver, although the duration of follow-up was insufficient to draw definitive conclusions. Two studies (Abdulkarim et al 69 and Koskinas et al 68 ) reported iron reaccumulation in the hepatic explant.…”
Section: Transplantation Of a Hemochromatosis Donor Livermentioning
confidence: 99%