1997
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1700946
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transplantation of cord blood progenitor cells can promote bone resorption in autosomal recessive osteopetrosis

Abstract: Summary:reported to be potentially capable of correcting bone abnormalities in patients affected by juvenile osteopetrosis. 7-10The best results have been obtained in children transplanted Allogeneic BMT has been reported to be the only curative therapy for children with juvenile autosomal recessusing an HLA-identical relative, whereas those given BMT from an unrelated volunteer or particularly from an HLAive osteopetrosis. We report the case of a 14-month-old child in whom bone resorption was observed after c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data collected on the 14 additional ARO patients herein described (Table 2) further support this evidence and show that HSCT is not usually performed when CNS deficit is present, due to the little benefit they would gain (Mazzolari et al, 2009). In this regard, the comparison of the clinical history of patient 15 (previously described in Locatelli et al, 1997) and patient 14 on the one hand, and of patient 25 on the other, is significant. Briefly, at diagnosis (4 months) patient 15 presented with a typical osteopetrotic bone phenotype, mild anaemia and progressive deterioration of visual and neurologic function, together with moderate cortical atrophy.…”
Section: Clinical Observations: Recessive Patientssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Data collected on the 14 additional ARO patients herein described (Table 2) further support this evidence and show that HSCT is not usually performed when CNS deficit is present, due to the little benefit they would gain (Mazzolari et al, 2009). In this regard, the comparison of the clinical history of patient 15 (previously described in Locatelli et al, 1997) and patient 14 on the one hand, and of patient 25 on the other, is significant. Briefly, at diagnosis (4 months) patient 15 presented with a typical osteopetrotic bone phenotype, mild anaemia and progressive deterioration of visual and neurologic function, together with moderate cortical atrophy.…”
Section: Clinical Observations: Recessive Patientssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…There are only few reported cases of successful cord blood transplantation in OP, [26][27][28][29] and variations in genotype, phenotype treatment before cord blood infusion and stem cell dose make any conclusions difficult. In addition, negative outcomes are likely to be under-reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this experience represents a single patient, it is possible that engraftment was achieved owing to prior bony remodeling following engraftment with the first transplant, as this graft slowly failed over period of more than two years. The prior transient osteoclast engraftment with partial recanalization of the marrow cavity following the first transplant 26 may have provided a greater opportunity for donor cells to localize to the marrow.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…by guest www.bloodjournal.org From sibling transplantation, when such a donor is not available, transplantation using grafts from an HLA-mismatched relative, an adult unrelated donor or umbilical cord blood is a reasonable approach for an otherwise lethal disease. 5,[13][14][15][16][17] Despite the relatively modest longterm survival and the fact that several of these patients are visually impaired, they appear to be engaged socially based on functional scores and the reported school attendance. Mortality rates within the first year after transplantation were high, with graft failure and early transplant-related complications accounting for most deaths.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%