2016
DOI: 10.1002/uog.15861
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transperineal use of a pocket‐sized ultrasound machine vs conventional transvaginal ultrasound: a blinded comparison of cervical length in pregnancy

Abstract: Transperineal use of a pocket-sized ultrasound machine versus conventional transvaginal ultrasound: A blinded comparison of cervical length in pregnancySpontaneous preterm birth is a leading cause of neonatal mortality and morbidity and remains a particular challenge in obstetrics 1 . Sonographic cervical length (CL) is useful to aid in managing women at risk of preterm labour and assist in effective use of healthcare resources. We present our study, evaluating the feasibility and accuracy of measuring CL with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
references
References 5 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance