2010
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1709268
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transparency Regulation as a Remedy for Network Neutrality Concerns: Experimental Results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(ii) Transparency rules: The imposition of transparency rules is seen by many as the panacea to protecting the open internet. In a study conducted on the effect of transparency on the behaviour of ISPs and consumers (Sluijs et al, 2010), the results were obtained based on four levels of transparency: no information, full information, full information to only a sublet of end-users and simplified information to all users (Read, 2012). The findings revealed that transparency allowed end-users to make informed decisions, spurred economic efficiency, increased consumer satisfaction and provided positive incentives to the ISPs to improve their quality of services, thereby stimulating competition in the market.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(ii) Transparency rules: The imposition of transparency rules is seen by many as the panacea to protecting the open internet. In a study conducted on the effect of transparency on the behaviour of ISPs and consumers (Sluijs et al, 2010), the results were obtained based on four levels of transparency: no information, full information, full information to only a sublet of end-users and simplified information to all users (Read, 2012). The findings revealed that transparency allowed end-users to make informed decisions, spurred economic efficiency, increased consumer satisfaction and provided positive incentives to the ISPs to improve their quality of services, thereby stimulating competition in the market.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is currently not (satisfactorily) done and would potentially require ex ante NN rules. The usefulness of transparency in the context of NN is discussed in detail by Faulhaber (2010) and Sluijs, Schuett, and Henze (2010). Faulhaber (2010) emphasizes that information has to be easily accessible and understandable to be helpful in the NN context.…”
Section: Status Quomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the information should be verifiable. In contrast to this qualitative approach, Sluijs et al (2010) use an economic laboratory experiment to study the impact of transparency. They simulate a market with two ISPs and a potential customer base with human participants and vary the information about the delivered service quality available to the customers.…”
Section: Status Quomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Open access to the Internet is a topic that has the potential to draw substantial attention from a wide public, as has been demonstrated in the net neutrality incidents mentioned earlier. Moreover, there is evidence that suggests that transparency can also work if the information provided to the end users is not complete, or when the information does not reach all the end users (Sluijs, 2010). The key question, however, is whether consumers will indeed change ISPs in the current value chain environment.…”
Section: Transparency As a First Non-intrusive Measurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, there is evidence that suggests that transparency can also work if the information provided to the end users is not complete, or when the information does not reach all the end users (Sluijs et al, 2010). The key question, however, is whether consumers will indeed change ISPs in the current value chain environment.…”
Section: Transparency As a First Non-intrusive Measurementioning
confidence: 99%