Transparency level of the electronic procurement system in Malaysia

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to examine the level of transparency of the electronic procurement (e-procurement) system in Malaysia. Design/methodology/approach Using the content analysis method, 23 transparency disclosure items from the Website Attribute Evaluation System (WAES) checklist were used to evaluate the transparency level of the e-procurement system. The data gathered from the WAES were analysed using frequency and percentage based on the various categories of transparency. Findings The study reveals that the e-procurement system disclosed 17 out of the 23 WAES transparency disclosure items, which represents a transparency disclosure level of 73.91%. Of the five categories of disclosure, i.e. ownership, contact information, organizational information, citizen consequences and freshness, the detailed results show that the items are fully disclosed for only two categories, and for three categories, i.e. ownership, contact information and organizational information, the items are not fully disclosed. Research limitations/implications The findings of the present research offer a positive indication that the government is moving in the right direction, particularly in efforts to reduce the corruption level in procurement activities and to improve the accountability level of the government. Originality/value The present study is among the few studies that attempts to address a fundamental issue of transparency in the public procurement system that has an important relationship with the occurrence of corruption in procurement activities.

Unveiling the transition: Factors influencing true and fair view reporting in the accrual-based accounting migration of Malaysian federal statutory bodies

“…It recognises that institutions operate within a broader societal framework that includes various institutions. The Malaysian government implemented the accrual accounting system as a replacement for the modified cash-based accounting system to enhance accountability and transparency (Ahmad, Abul Hassan, & Ismail, 2023). For elucidating the framework, Institutional Theory emerges as the most fitting option, exerting influence on both the framers of the framework and the regulators and standard-setters.…”

“…Questions 11 to 20 in Section C focus on the topic of "Political interventions" and are based on the works of Najaf and Najaf (2021), Yudhanti and Tjahjadi (2021), andMagro and Klann (2021). Questions 21 to 30 in Section D are about "Economic consequences" and are adapted from the studies ofWu et al (2016),Wardhani (2019), andAhmad et al (2023).…”

The landscape of public procurement research: a bibliometric analysis and topic modelling based on Scopus

“…Moreover, a pending research question is how the adoption of emerging technologies (e.g. big data analytics, blockchain technology and artificial intelligence) can serve as a tool to curb fraudulent practices in PP (Ahmad et al , 2021), reduce process inefficiencies (Velasco et al , 2021) and anticipate problematic PP contracts (Gallego et al , 2021). As a result, future studies on the impact of modern technology-enabled PP on efficiency and corruption levels are necessary to enable competitive tendering processes, increase transparency and establish accountability for PP decisions (Knack et al , 2019).…”

Detecting and Preventing Fraud in e-procurement of Public Sector: A Review, Synthesis and Opportunities for Future Research

“…Those ten studies mainly identified e-procurement as a tool to mitigate procurement fraud and also to carry out procurement process in a more transparent manner. The main drivers of e-procurement adoption are transaction and administration cost savings, reduced time, increased transparency, and improved communication between suppliers and buyers (Ahmad and Ismail, 2021;Neupane et al, 2014;Abdullahi et al, 2019;Rotchanakitumnuai, 2013;Said and Omar, 2017;Sholihin and Alim, 2020;Azmi and Rahman, 2015;Nawi et al, 2017;Shukla and Shah, 2016;Khan et al, 2022). All the studies are found to be from various journals such as emerald, Asia-Pacific Management Accounting Journal (APMAJ), Journal of Management and Humanities and International Journal of Supply Chain Management (IJSCM).…”