Transparencia y género: el impacto de las compras electrónicas en el acceso a licitaciones públicas de las PyME lideradas por mujeres

Pierri, Gastón; Jarquín, María José

doi:10.18235/0003872

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Regarding public procurement policies, the inclusion of women in the entire process can affect the quality of life of this group and their economic autonomy [36]. In addition, there is evidence that women tolerate acts of corruption less than men according to Guerra et al [37].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Data Mining Approach to Detecting Bias and Favoritism in Public Procurement

Torres-Berru¹,

Lopez-Batista²,

Zhingre³

2023

Intelligent Automation &Amp; Soft Computing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In a public procurement process, corruption can occur at each stage, favoring a participant with a previous agreement, which can result in over-pricing and purchases of substandard products, as well as gender discrimination. This paper's aim is to detect biased purchases using a Spanish Language corpus, analyzing text from the questions and answers registry platform by applicants in a public procurement process in Ecuador. Additionally, gender bias is detected, promoting both men and women to participate under the same conditions. In order to detect gender bias and favoritism towards certain providers by contracting entities, the study proposes a unique hybrid model that combines Artificial Intelligence algorithms and Natural Language Processing (NLP). In the experimental work, 303,076 public procurement processes have been analyzed over 10 years (since 2010) with 1,009,739 questions and answers to suppliers and public institutions in each process. Gender bias and favoritism were analyzed using a Word2vec model with word embedding, as well as sentiment analysis of the questions and answers using the VADER algorithm. In 32% of cases (96,984 answers), there was favoritism or gender bias as evidenced by responses from contracting entities. The proposed model provides accuracy rates of 88% for detecting favoritism, and 90% for detecting gender bias. Consequently one-third of the procurement processes carried out by the state have indications of corruption and bias. In Latin America, government corruption is one of the most significant challenges, making the resulting classifier useful for detecting bias and favoritism in public procurement processes.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%