2013
DOI: 10.1002/jcu.22063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transoral sonographic diagnosis of submandibular duct calculi

Abstract: We present a case of submandibular duct calculi diagnosed using transoral sonography. Sonography is the first-line imaging modality of salivary gland calculi. However, it is performed via a transcutaneous approach, which is limited in identifying small salivary duct calculi. Using an intraoral transducer, transoral sonography can visualize the submandibular duct and detect the presence of small calculi, thus overcoming the limitations of transcutaneous sonography.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
20
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The stones, which were all clinically and ultrasonographically classified as intra-parenchymal, were successfully retrieved from all but seven patients, in whom the failure was due to the fact that the stone could not be separated from the gland tissue despite the use of dedicated elevators. This good result is in line with our initial experience 1 and what has been reported by other authors 4 6 16 , and demonstrate that the procedure is effective in removing deep submandibular stones. Most of these can be removed without using a sialendoscope but, in 9% of cases, the bright guidance of the sialendoscopic unit facilitated the search for residual parenchymal microliths that had cracked during removal of the main stone or migrated backwards to the peri-hilar region.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The stones, which were all clinically and ultrasonographically classified as intra-parenchymal, were successfully retrieved from all but seven patients, in whom the failure was due to the fact that the stone could not be separated from the gland tissue despite the use of dedicated elevators. This good result is in line with our initial experience 1 and what has been reported by other authors 4 6 16 , and demonstrate that the procedure is effective in removing deep submandibular stones. Most of these can be removed without using a sialendoscope but, in 9% of cases, the bright guidance of the sialendoscopic unit facilitated the search for residual parenchymal microliths that had cracked during removal of the main stone or migrated backwards to the peri-hilar region.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…A trans-oral approach has recently been proposed as a gland-preserving alternative to sialadenectomy for deep and parenchymal stones 4 6 . The main limitations of previously published studies are that many also included stones located in the main submandibular duct, very few describe long-term surgical results and none considered patients' subjective perceptions or QoL factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Eighty percent of the submandibular sialolithiasis is in the Wharton's duct, and 20% of it is in the gland. Its size may differ from a few millimeter to a few centimeter (5). The salivary gland stones are thought to grow approximately up to 1-1.5 mm in a year (6).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%