2022
DOI: 10.3390/cancers14153837
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transoral Robotic Surgery for Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Tonsil versus Base of Tongue: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract: Transoral Robotic Surgery (TORS) has become widely adopted for the surgical removal of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC), with the most common locations being in the tonsil and base of tongue (BOT). However, it is currently unknown if TORS has equal efficacy and outcomes in patients with tonsillar or BOT OPSCC. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the margin status and recurrence rates of tonsillar and BOT OPSCC after TORS. Per PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL were systemati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 81 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the anatomic subsite of head and neck cancers is an important general consideration, it is also important to recognize potential challenges of anatomic sites within the oropharyngeal designation. The article by Poupore evaluates the efficacy of transoral robotic surgery of the tonsil versus the base of the tongue by evaluating margin status, recurrence, and complication rates [ 11 ]. While there was a higher rate of positive margins in the base of the tongue, there was no difference in locoregional or metastatic recurrence rates between these subsites.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the anatomic subsite of head and neck cancers is an important general consideration, it is also important to recognize potential challenges of anatomic sites within the oropharyngeal designation. The article by Poupore evaluates the efficacy of transoral robotic surgery of the tonsil versus the base of the tongue by evaluating margin status, recurrence, and complication rates [ 11 ]. While there was a higher rate of positive margins in the base of the tongue, there was no difference in locoregional or metastatic recurrence rates between these subsites.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%