2020
DOI: 10.1002/hed.26447
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transoral robotic selective neck dissection for papillary thyroid carcinoma: Is it appropriate?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some researchers believe that super-selective lymph node dissection is feasible, especially in robot-assisted and endoscopic surgery [ 16 , 18 ], while other researchers doubt the safety of this approach. Doctor Piccin [ 19 ] suggests that patients with preoperatively proven PTC LLN metastasis should undergo dissection including levels II to V and that the transoral robotic approach may not be the ideal surgical technique for neck dissection. In a study conducted by Doctor Zhao [ 16 ], the experimental group underwent selective dissection at levels III and IV, and the control group underwent standardized dissection at levels II through V. The rate of lymph node metastasis at level II in the control group was 33% (42/147).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers believe that super-selective lymph node dissection is feasible, especially in robot-assisted and endoscopic surgery [ 16 , 18 ], while other researchers doubt the safety of this approach. Doctor Piccin [ 19 ] suggests that patients with preoperatively proven PTC LLN metastasis should undergo dissection including levels II to V and that the transoral robotic approach may not be the ideal surgical technique for neck dissection. In a study conducted by Doctor Zhao [ 16 ], the experimental group underwent selective dissection at levels III and IV, and the control group underwent standardized dissection at levels II through V. The rate of lymph node metastasis at level II in the control group was 33% (42/147).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%