37th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit 1999
DOI: 10.2514/6.1999-798
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transonic flutter computations for a 2D supercritical wing

Abstract: A n umerical investigation of the transonic twodegree-of-freedom bending/torsion utter characteristics of the NLR 7301 section is presented using a time domain method. An unsteady, t wo-dimensional, compressible, thin-layer Navier-Stokes ow-solver is coupled with a two-degree-of-freedom structural model. Furthermore, the Baldwin-Lomax, the Baldwin-Barth and the Spalart-Allmaras turbulence models are implemented, each in conjunction with the transition model of Gostelow et al. The transition onset location can … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerical investigations on the transonic test case MP77 (nominal M ∞ = 0.768, α = 1.28 • and Re = 1.7·10 6 ) have been performed in the time-domain by a number of authors. [27][28][29][30] The common result in those investigations is the prediction of limit-cycle flutter at amplitudes one order of magnitude larger than those observed in the experiments.…”
Section: A Nonlinear Flutter Of a Supercritical Airfoilmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Numerical investigations on the transonic test case MP77 (nominal M ∞ = 0.768, α = 1.28 • and Re = 1.7·10 6 ) have been performed in the time-domain by a number of authors. [27][28][29][30] The common result in those investigations is the prediction of limit-cycle flutter at amplitudes one order of magnitude larger than those observed in the experiments.…”
Section: A Nonlinear Flutter Of a Supercritical Airfoilmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Similar observations are made in Refs. [26][27][28][29][30]. Further investigations are needed to resolve those issues, given that generally speaking flows over many other airfoils have been well predicted by modern Navier-Stokes computations, at least for steady-state solutions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was shown by Weber et al [24] that during this period the shock on the suction side becomes stronger and moves upstream causing a shock induced separation. After reversal of the pitch motion, a smooth pitching moment coefficient variation is predicted up to the highest pitching moment coefficient.…”
Section: Flutter Computationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned before, the As shown in [13][14], because of the relatively large chord length of the airfoil with respect to the wind tunnel test section (1 m x 1 m), both the freestream Mach number and the angle of attack need to be corrected to take into account wind tunnel wall effects. Figure 4, the resultfrom Eulercomputation overpredicts the shockstrength.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The criterionusedin [13][14]wasto matchthe computed to the measured time-averaged surface pressure distribution. Note that the off-diagonal terms in the damping matrix are assumed to be zero for simplicity.…”
Section: Numerical Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%