Transnational Operations, International Reactions, and Legitimacy: The Case of Turkey and Saudi Arabia

Abstract

Maintaining global peace and security remains an essential concern for many actors in the international system. To achieve this goal, both states and international organizations commend that action needs to be taken against perceived threats to national and international security. However, how to respond to these threats continues to divide the world. The declining role of the UN in peace enforcement, emergence of non-state actors, new forms of threats, and increasing unilateral actions by states have raised questions over the legitimacy of who, when, and how these actions can be taken. This article seeks to examine how international actors respond to transnational counterterrorism events. It adopts a comparative case study to discuss how regional and international actors reacted to Saudi Arabia’s Operation Decisive Storm in Yemen (2015) and Turkey’s Operation Peace Spring in Northern Syria (2019). It draws important similarities in the justification of both countries’ actions and the varying responses and attitudes these countries have received for their actions. The study identifies the lack of international consensus on transnational counterterrorism as a catalyst in the crisis being witnessed in crisis resolution. Factors such as timing, universality of the threat, prevailing circumstances, actors involved, and mode of operation shape international response on transnational actions.

Toward Islam Through Political Parties, Ideology, and Democracy: A Discourse Analysis on Turkey’s AK Party, Tunisian Ennahda, and Bangladesh Jamaat-e-Islami

“…Most of these countries are inspired by the level of political maturity, experience, and leadership positions of the Turkish AK Party. Several scholars highlighted that the current 'multi-dimensional foreign policy of Turkey' and Turkey's AK Party model have soft power impact on the democratization process in the Middle East (Altunisik 2005;Dede 2011;Islam 2017Islam , 2019Islam , 2020aIslam , 2020cIslam , 2020dIslam and Cansu 2018;Nyadera and Islam 2020b). Besides, Dede (2011) and Islam, Bingol, and Nyadera (2020) incline that for economic sustainability, 'balancing of Islam and democracy from the grassroots and soft power impacts on the Middle East, Turkey's AK Party is hailed as a model for North Africa (MENA) and the Middle East regions.'…”

The Impact of the Different Dimensions of Job Quality on Job Satisfaction in the Public and Private sector. What is Wrong with the Social Environment?

“…From the perspective of objectives, public sector workers could have goals that satisfy more altruistic, less materialistic needs, and therefore be more motivated than private sector workers (Gans-Morse et al, 2022). In any case, the structure of public sector organizations, often more bureaucratic than in the private sector, may impede the fulfilment of these purposes (Nyadera & Islam, 2020; Steijn & Van der Voet, 2019). Likewise, less clarity in the definition of organizational objectives could reduce job satisfaction in the public sector (Kjeldsen & Hansen, 2018).…”

Foreign Policy Analysis of Operation Peace Spring by Turkey in 2019 as a Form of Securitization of the Syrian Refugee Crisis

“…Of course, in the realization of these policies, it is necessary to have support both from within the country or from abroad, especially to the United Nations (UN). Recep Tayyip Erdogan, as the President of Turkey has been promoting this foreign policy since 2015 both at home and abroad to gain his support (Nyadera & Islam, 2020). As such, providing security for refugees is a challenge both inside and outside the refugee camps.…”