The author started by describing the physical characteristics of the new dataset in a bid to understand their spatial underlying behavior. This is done by displaying the results in Table 1 with the characteristics of UON being presented in Table 1. Generally, this are the results which will be employed in the structural equation modelling to find the influence research, teaching, attitude, performance and internationalization has on academic quality. First, generally, across the Table 1, we see the main parameters of study, comprising of the construct parameters teaching, research, performance, internationalization and learner attitude with each of the constructs having been parameterized by the respective actual variables. Their respective means and standard deviation have also been presented.Thus, based from the Table 1, we see that, and starting with the construct parameter teaching, it has been parameterized by the actual variables; university reputation, curriculum quality, student ration and teaching quality. Starting with teaching, we see that the reputation has mean value of 3.0, curriculum quality 1.3, student-teacher ratio 3.2 and teaching quality 4.0. A view of their means shows that the highest is by teaching quality and lowest by curriculum quality with the implication that the most stressed activity is teaching quality unlike curriculum quality in that order. Going by research construct, research reputation has the mean value 8.6, research reputation survey 2.4, conditional peer reviewed publication 4.1, research grant sufficiency 1.6, influenced research direction 2.4 while cited writing has the statistics 0.7. This implies that under research the research reputation is the most actualized parameter. Based on attitude the fact that the learner has an attitude towards the teaching staff and towards the curriculum is 4.3 and 3.2 respectively and for an implication that the attitude of the learners is significant. If it's for internationalization, we realize that the parameterization variables such as the reputation satisfaction (with mean 3.2), reputation influenced institution selection, alumni employability (with mean 4.1) and the ratio of domestic to international students (2.5) have the highest means compared to the Nobel prize aligned preference variable (mean value 1.4). If it regards performance, the participation in per capita activity variable (mean value 0.1) is the least activity while the research impact transformation (4.3) and the education quality (4.9) have the highest contribution of the mean activity. Based on the above parameter characteristic, an overview of these parameters shows them as relatively significant and important in describing the constructed variables important in demystifying relevant contribution of the constructs to represent the academic quality of the university of Nairobi.