Transnational Digital Intimacy Practices: Paradoxes of Transnational Connectivity and Home-Making among Young Adult Expatriates in Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Abstract

Personal and intimate consequences of cultural globalization have received little critical attention in comparison to scholarship on politics, finance, or the environment. Taking digital technology practices of young adult expatriates as an entry point to understand the emotional and affective consequences of transnational mobility, in this article we research the interrelated cultural politics of emotion, migration, and digitization of middle-class mobilities. Presenting a case study of digital experiences of young adult expatriates (aged fifteen to twenty-five years) living in the Netherlands, we seek to better understand how emotions and affects of middle-class transnational mobility are mediated through digital technologies. Our empirical argument draws from thirty-one semistructured, face-to-face in-depth interviews with young adult expatriates and smartphone photo-elicitation exercises. We develop the notion of transnational digital intimacy practices to address how transnational mobile subjects negotiate emotional precarity through selective smartphone and social media practices. Finally, we call into question the notion of “expatriates” as supposed elite mobiles with global privilege. This article is part of the Global Perspectives, Media and Communication special issue on “Media, Migration, and Nationalism,” guest-edited by Koen Leurs and Tomohisa Hirata.

The Paradox of a Mobile Society: Situating Cultural Studies in the Global South Context

“…As I have shown in the previous sections, both mobilities and immobilities manifest in the digital lifeworld of migrants. This point contributes to a growing body of study that attempts to map the contradictory aspects of transnational and networked lives (Patterson and Leurs, 2020;Ponzanesi, 2019;Twigt, 2022). In this regard, I consider cultural studies, by extending and problematising it in a global South context, as a political and intellectual inquiry that offers new ways and frames to articulate and investigate mobile, digital and transnational cultures.…”

‘Without technology we’d be very stuck’: Ageing migrants’ differential (im)mobile practices during a lockdown

“…More recently, it has begun problematising ‘physical immobilities’ of people and communities resulting from imposed restrictive mobility measures during the pandemic (Adey et al, 2021). Notably, people's forced physical immobility has already been explored in previous studies, suggesting how immobility regimes (Glick Schiller and Salazar, 2013), including policies and legislation (Turner, 2007), a brokerage system (Xiang and Lindquist, 2014), and surveillance technologies (Shamir, 2005) create conditions of physical immobility for certain bodies, such as refugees (Patterson and Leurs, 2020; Smets, 2019; Witteborn, 2011) and migrants (Glick Schiller and Salazar, 2013; Lin et al, 2017). In the context of media and communications, an emerging body of work has begun exploring how both movements and stillness are generated through everyday, digital, and care practices, as shaped by social relations, power dynamics, and digital infrastructures (Cabalquinto, 2022; Leurs, 2014; Seuferling, 2021; Smets, 2019).…”

Digitally Mediated Diasporic Formations

“…It derives from the Latin-based concept of "expatriate," and was initially used to describe foreign workers who work abroad from the perspective of the homeland (see Green 2009 for a historical overview of how the concept of expatriate changed over time in the United States). Nowadays, the term captures the migration of 39 Here, I want to highlight the importance of identifying the "expat" terminology as self-identified and therefore performative (see Patterson and Leurs 2020). It is not an analytical tool per se.…”