1995
DOI: 10.1159/000201302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transmucosal Potential Difference as an Index of Esophageal Mucosal Integrity

Abstract: All the epithelia lining the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, including that of the esophagus, exhibit a transmucosal electrical potential difference (PD). The luminal surface of the GI mucosa is indeed electrically negative when compared with the serosal one. Although it was initially felt that the body of the esophagus exhibits a PD near 0 or slightly positive, recent studies, using parenteral reference electrodes, have shown a negative PD of around -15 mV. Measurement of esophageal PD has been mainly used to lo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The transmucosal potential difference maintained across the healthy mucosa is thought to be due to asymmetric ion pumping combined with resistance to the back-diffusion of the separated charge (23). A decreased transmucosal potential difference is indicative of a loss of mucosal integrity and also points to a disturbed mitochondrial energy turnover (24). The degree of impairment of the protective mucosal barrier may range from reversible permeability changes to complete transmural necrosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transmucosal potential difference maintained across the healthy mucosa is thought to be due to asymmetric ion pumping combined with resistance to the back-diffusion of the separated charge (23). A decreased transmucosal potential difference is indicative of a loss of mucosal integrity and also points to a disturbed mitochondrial energy turnover (24). The degree of impairment of the protective mucosal barrier may range from reversible permeability changes to complete transmural necrosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ESSE and BSCE differ not only structurally, as the names imply, but also functionally, and one marker of this functional difference is reflected by differences in their in vivo transmural electrical potential difference (PD). The in vivo PD for ESSE averages Ϫ15 Ϯ 5 mV and the in vivo PD for BSCE is typically greater than Ϫ25 mV (11,22,24,30,39). Since the PD, according to Ohm's law, is the product of current times (electrical) resistance, such differences in PD for ESSE and BSCE indicate that these epithelia have fundamental differences in ion transport and/or barrier properties.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PD was recorded online on a Personal Computer (Power Macintosh 7100/80, Apple Computer Inc., Cupertino, CA, USA). Measurements were performed by estimating the charge difference between the reference probe of a pH glass electrode located 5 cm above the LES and a subcutaneous NaCl-perfused catheter which were connected to each other via a calomel electrode (22).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%