Transmucosal healing around peri‐implant defects: crestal and subcrestal implant placement in dogs

Abstract

Peri-implant defects of 1.25 mm width healed with spontaneous bone regeneration around implants placed transmucosally at crestal or 2 mm subcrestal with a high degree of osseointegration after a 3-month healing period.

Retracted: Influence of the implant design on osseointegration and crestal bone resorption of immediate implants: a histomorphometric study in dogs

“…; Tran et al. ). Thus, subcrestal insertion of dental implants may facilitate and earlier BIC at the neck of the implant.…”

“…Tran et al. () concluded that with a daily plaque control, transmucosal implants placed crestally or 2 mm subcrestally may undergo bone regeneration and gap filling with newly formed bone.…”

The effects of healing abutments of different size and anatomic shape placed immediately in extraction sockets on peri‐implant hard and soft tissues. A pilot study in foxhound dogs

“…Bone loss and soft tissue modifications occurring after extraction can compromise the choice of implant type/design as well as esthetic and functional outcomes (Tran et al. ). In the present study, resorption of the buccal plate was seen to be more pronounced and this bone dehiscence following implant placement corroborates findings reported in previous dog experiments (Araújo & Lindhe ; Araújo et al.…”

Biomechanical evaluation of subcrestal dental implants with different bone anchorages

“…2 However, in regions of poor bone quality, such as the posterior maxilla, 3 adequate primary stability cannot be achieved at bone level, necessitating subcrestal placement. 4 Moreover, this deeper position may also be indicated when there is limited interocclusal height for the restoration and for an esthetic emergence profile. 5,6 Declaration of Interests: The authors certify that they have no commercial or associative interest that represents a conflict of interest in connection with the manuscript.…”