882 Dyck (LLEM) are discussed separately in a subsequent section. The series of field examples presented include the Trillabelle and Gertrude deposits in the Sudbury, Canada region, which have served as test sites for many different methods, and several examples which have recently appeared in the literature. These examples illustrate the range of approaches that are taken to interpretation. HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENTThe course of development of EM methods applied in drill holes has been treated in some detail in Dyck (1975b) and only highlights are given here. EM methods were first applied in the well-logging industry (induction loggers). Doll (1949) described the basis for interpretation of induction logs as the "geometrical factor" concept in which noninteracting (i.e. resistive limit) eddy currents are induced in the medium. The eddy currents are considered to be concentric with the drill hole for the simplest configuration in which both transmitter and receiver are close together (of the order of 1 m) and lie coaxial with the hole (configura-EM TRANSMITTER :.i.i:i:!:OVERBURDE.. N AND/OR WEATHERED SHALLOW TARGET RECEIVER tion a, Figure 2). The use of this rather large-diameter device has not spread to mining exploration. An exception is a recent development in France of a similar short-spacing device designed specifically for slim-hole detection of highly conducting metallic sulfides (Frignet, 1986).One of the first large-scale prospecting systems designed to detect conducting sulfide bodies at some distance from the hole was introduced in Noakes (1951). The prototype system was similar to the surface Turam method (Parasnis, 1991, this volume) in that the transmitter was a large, fixed loop and the receiver a dual-coil device that measured the difference in magnetic field at two points about 15 rn apart. This equipment, by demonstrating that the method worked, became the forerunner of modern frequencydomain (FEM) drill-hole systems using large-loop transmitters. A similar concept was described in Vekseer and Plyusnin (1957). Concurrently, Ward and Harvey (1954) developed a tilt-angle method of downhole EM surveying in which the configuration was minimum coupled (of the type depicted in Figure 2b). While this method is not presently in use, it has characteristics which suggest that it should be revived. A third type of large-scale system employs the fixedseparation, coaxial-coil configuration akin to the induction logger (Figure 2a). Elliot (1961, 1966) de-(a) (b) XRx •Tx MINOR SULFIDE STRINGERS (MODERATE-HIGH) DEEP TARGET CONDUCTIVITY • HIGH (1-10 3 S/m) ?. '"i• MODERATE (10-3-1 S/m) • LOW (10 -5 -10-3S/m) SENSOR MINERALIZED HORIZON Downloaded 08/21/15 to 155.69.4.4. Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at http://library.seg.org/ Drill-hole EM 883 scribed such a system which operated at 1230 Hz and measured in-phase and quadrature components of secondary field with a sensitivity of 100 ppm. Versions which could operate at coil separations of up to 150 rn (Smith and Hallof, 1971) we...