1986
DOI: 10.1002/ajim.4700090606
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transmission of occupational disease to family contacts

Abstract: As recognition of occupational illness increases, the scope of health problems related to work widens. An important area of concern is the worker's family, which has been shown to be at increased risk of disease attributable to the hazards previously thought to be relevant only to the worker. Such "para-occupational" disease occurs particularly in spouses and children through transport by the worker of hazardous materials from the worksite into the home. The most common vehicle has been contaminated work cloth… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
2

Year Published

1991
1991
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
29
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Another indirect route of exposure may be by household contamination with substances brought home by the father, although this mechanism is less well documented (29).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another indirect route of exposure may be by household contamination with substances brought home by the father, although this mechanism is less well documented (29).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This pathway involves the transport of contaminants from the workplace to the residence on a worker's clothing or person. Compounds that are likely to cling to and are difficult to remove from clothing, shoes, skin, or hair (e.g., beryllium, asbestos, lead, pesticides) are potential takehome contaminants, and the take-home pathway has been well documented for several of these compounds (Knishkowy and Baker 1986;McDiarmid and Weaver 1993;NIOSH 1995). A recent study by Lu et al (2000) indicated that the take-home pathway is a significant contributor to residential contamination in the homes of agricultural workers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trabalho de coorte prospectivo, realizado por Selikoff et al em isoladores térmicos norte-americanos, mostra tempo de latência entre 25 e 40 anos em 175 casos de MM 38 . Quanto ao tipo de contaminação ocorrida, podemos classificar os três casos, respectivamente, em domiciliar (caso 1), ocupacional (caso 2) e ocupacional indireto (caso 3) [39][40][41] . Apesar da ocupação relatada no caso 3 não se relacionar, etiologicamente, com MM, a freqüência quase que diária a um ambiente de trabalho contaminado por asbes-to, durante quase três anos, por motivos extraocupacionais, não anula as características ocupacionais indiretas de exposição a que se submeteu o paciente.…”
Section: Discussão E Conclusãounclassified