2003
DOI: 10.1128/iai.71.4.2071-2078.2003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transmission ofAnaplasma phagocytophilumtoIxodes ricinusTicks from Sheep in the Acute and Post-Acute Phases of Infection

Abstract: A total of 60 sheep were exposed to Anaplasma phagocytophilum infection on an enclosed area of Ixodes ricinus-infested pasture in North Wales, United Kingdom, and rapidly acquired acute A. phagocytophilum infections detectable by PCR and blood smear examination. Of the ticks that had engorged in the previous instar on infected sheep, 52% of adult ticks and 28% of nymphs were PCR positive; a significant, 10-fold increase in prevalence compared to that of ticks that engorged on sheep preinfection was observed (P… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore it can be assumed that Arvicolidae act as reservoir host for A. phagocytophilum in southern Germany. Investigations from Switzerland and England showed that deer and sheep can also be reservoir hosts (Liz et al 2002;Odgen et al 2003).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore it can be assumed that Arvicolidae act as reservoir host for A. phagocytophilum in southern Germany. Investigations from Switzerland and England showed that deer and sheep can also be reservoir hosts (Liz et al 2002;Odgen et al 2003).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a sensitive and specific technique such as PCR is required for the definitive diagnosis of A. phagocytophilum. This assay has the advantage of being able to yield positive results during the early acute phase of the infection and the carrier stage (Ogden et al, 2003;de la Fuente et al, 2005a). On the other hand, studies also indicated that some seropositive animals can be negative by PCR or seronegative animals can be PCR positive Stuen et al, 2002;de la Fuente et al, 2005b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is thought to be either due to an increase in the number of feeding ticks altering the level of bacteremia, or due to frequent reinfections 63 . The increase in the number of feeding ticks could be due to blood loss and/or immunomodulatory effects of tick saliva 107 or due to a reduced mobilization of infected granulocytes at tick‐feeding lesions 108 …”
Section: Persistence and “Carrier” Statementioning
confidence: 99%