Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpc.2013.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transmission of DNA damage and increasing reprotoxic effects over two generations of Daphnia magna exposed to uranium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
17
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Such an increase in sensitivity to uranium has also been measured on Daphnia magna with an increase in DNA damages and in the severity of effects on life history traits across the generations. 54,55 This general pattern in the MGU may suggest that the energy allocation shifted in this population toward individuals with a longer body-size and a lower resistance to the uranium.…”
Section: ■ Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Such an increase in sensitivity to uranium has also been measured on Daphnia magna with an increase in DNA damages and in the severity of effects on life history traits across the generations. 54,55 This general pattern in the MGU may suggest that the energy allocation shifted in this population toward individuals with a longer body-size and a lower resistance to the uranium.…”
Section: ■ Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The available literature within the crustacean subphylum suggests the presence of effects over multiple generations (Alonzo et al, 2008a;Plaire et al, 2013;Massarin et al, 2010;Parisot et al, 2015;Sarapultseva & Gorski, 2013). Alonzo et al, (2008a) and Massarin et al, (2010) recorded an increase in the magnitude of deleterious effects across generations in Daphnia magna exposed to chronic alpha irradiation and chronic waterborne uranium exposure respectively, with severe impacts to fitness and reproduction in individuals of the F 2 generation.…”
Section: The Effect Of Ionising Radiation On Reproduction In Crustaceansmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The authors (Parisot et al, 2015) hypothesised that a cumulative radiation dose may be necessary to elicit compensatory mechanisms such as DNA repair, accounting for the differential radiosensitivity between generations. Studies of radionuclide exposed daphnids using RAPD-PCR methods have indicated transmission of DNA damage from adult female daphnids to progeny across generations (Parisot et al, 2015;Plaire et al, 2013). This may be mediated by an epigenetic mechanism, as has been proposed for the transmission of effects in D. magna exposed to a range of chemical toxicants (Vandegehuchte et al, 2010) causing alterations to gene expression across generations.…”
Section: The Effect Of Ionising Radiation On Reproduction In Crustaceansmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This technique has been used to detect signs of genotoxicity from various contaminants, including non-essential metals, such as cadmium, boron, arsenic, mercury, nickel, and aluminum [15][16][17][18][19], and essential metals, such as zinc, sodium, manganese, and copper [6,7,9,[20][21][22]. RAPD has also been used to demonstrate the genotoxicity of various physical compounds, such as UV A and B [8] and gamma rays [23], the radioactivity of uranium and tritium [24,25] and emergent pollutant nanoparticles, such as ZnO and CuO [26]. The genotoxicity of organic compounds, such as drugs [27,29] or herbicides [11,[30][31][32] has also been largely studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%