2009
DOI: 10.1080/17405620902983519
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transmission of attachment across three generations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
26
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
4
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This pattern of attachment strategy reversal between parent and child has also been observed in other normative samples (Hautamaki et al, 2010), as well as in families with a history of maltreatment who are at high risk for insecure attachment (Crittenden et al, 1991; Farnfield et al, 2010). To further understand the transmission of insecure attachment being transmitted across generations, with an emphasis on unresolved trauma, we chose to utilize the Dynamic Maturational Model of Attachment and Adaptation (DMM) (see Farnfield et al (2010) for a detailed description of the various DMM measures).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…This pattern of attachment strategy reversal between parent and child has also been observed in other normative samples (Hautamaki et al, 2010), as well as in families with a history of maltreatment who are at high risk for insecure attachment (Crittenden et al, 1991; Farnfield et al, 2010). To further understand the transmission of insecure attachment being transmitted across generations, with an emphasis on unresolved trauma, we chose to utilize the Dynamic Maturational Model of Attachment and Adaptation (DMM) (see Farnfield et al (2010) for a detailed description of the various DMM measures).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…In addition, the DMM-AAI has been validated in a number of empirical studies focusing on fMRI associations (Strathearn, Fonagy, Amico, & Montague, 2009), associations with the Infant Strange Situation procedure (Shah, Fonagy, & Strathearn, 2010), and cross-generational patterning (Hautamäki, Hautamäki, Neuvonen, & Maliniemi-Piispanen, 2010) in normative samples, and with a variety of clinical issues: anxiety disorders (Hughes, Hardy, & Kendrick, 2000), borderline personality disorder (Crittenden & Newman, 2010), eating disorders (Ringer & Crittenden, 2007;Zachrisson & Kulbotten, 2006), factitious illness by proxy (Kozlowska, Foley, & Crittenden, 2006), posttraumatic stress disorder (Crittenden & Heller, 2013) and treatment outcomes (Gullestad, 2003). Interrater reliability for most of these studies was reported to be within accepted rates for interjudge reliability.…”
Section: Assessment Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, no studies have compared the two models in infancy, and only one study (Hautamäki, Hautamäki, Neuvonen, & Maliniemi-Piispanen, in press) has used the DMM method to test the intergenerational transmission of attachment. If an intergenerational relation from mother to infant were found using the DMM, it would strengthen the argument for continuity because the DMM-AAI is not predicated upon continuity, but rather upon adult adaptation.…”
Section: Is Attachment Transmitted Across Generations? the Plot Thickensmentioning
confidence: 99%