The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
IEEE PES T&D 2010 2010
DOI: 10.1109/tdc.2010.5484267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transmission network planning under a pricebased demand response program

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The demand response (DR) cost equals the incentive cost which is given to the customers for each kWh. For calculating the hourly DR costs in peak hours from 9:00 p.m. to 12:00 a.m., the average DR cost for this period is calculated as follows: By using Equation (27), the hourly DR cost is 670.96 ($/h). According to Table 3 After performing the demand response program, the TEP was performed.…”
Section: Study Of the Network And Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The demand response (DR) cost equals the incentive cost which is given to the customers for each kWh. For calculating the hourly DR costs in peak hours from 9:00 p.m. to 12:00 a.m., the average DR cost for this period is calculated as follows: By using Equation (27), the hourly DR cost is 670.96 ($/h). According to Table 3 After performing the demand response program, the TEP was performed.…”
Section: Study Of the Network And Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By using Equation (27), the hourly DR cost is 670.96 ($/h). According to Table 3, in scenario 3 in which the optimized objective function does not contain line construction costs, there is no limitation on the number of added lines.…”
Section: Cost Of Line ($/H) Total Cost ($/H)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to the electric power research institute (EPRI), it is expected that by 2020 up to 35% of the total vehicles in the U.S. will be PEVs [32]. The PEVs either in the form of source as a vehicle to grid (V2G) technology or load as a grid to vehicle (G2V) technology studies in the different fields of the power systems have been reported in the literature recently [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But either the reinforcement of the network or the FACTS are time-consuming and expensive. In some references [4][5], the nodal price in congestion area is raised, which can curtail the electricity demand with higher elasticity and attract investors to build new thermal generation in the electricity shortage area. But this will influence the economy and reliability of the system, and the new-built thermal generation still lags behind the electricity demand.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%