2003
DOI: 10.1109/tpwrs.2003.818689
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transmission network cost allocation based on equivalent bilateral exchanges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
93
0
12

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 161 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
93
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…It suggests the existence of a generator and a demand with the same active power, but in opposite directions. To tackle this problem, it proposes unbundling line flows using the EBE methodology [8], which allows identifying the responsibility of each generator/demand on the unbundled flows through every line. This methodology is based on the EBE principle, in which each generator provides a predefined fraction of power to each demand, and each demand receives a predefined fraction of power from each generator.…”
Section: Equivalent Bilateral Exchange (Ebe) Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It suggests the existence of a generator and a demand with the same active power, but in opposite directions. To tackle this problem, it proposes unbundling line flows using the EBE methodology [8], which allows identifying the responsibility of each generator/demand on the unbundled flows through every line. This methodology is based on the EBE principle, in which each generator provides a predefined fraction of power to each demand, and each demand receives a predefined fraction of power from each generator.…”
Section: Equivalent Bilateral Exchange (Ebe) Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The network usage method presented in [8] uses Equivalent Bilateral Exchanges (EBEs) to allocate costs to generators and demands. In order to create an EBE, each demand is attributed a generation fraction and, in the same way, a fraction of each demand is attributed to each generator.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the increasing penetration of DER at distribution level forces the need to adapt traditional cost allocation methods used in transmission system to the distribution level. In general, the cost allocation methods for transmission systems may be classified into three distinct categories: nodal marginal methods [3][4][5][6][7]; rolled-in methods [8][9][10][11]; embeddedmethods [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. The cost allocation based on nodal marginal pricing for transmission systems is presented in [3][4][5], in which are considered the long-term and short-term marginal costs related to energy, reliability, investments and demand side.…”
Section: Literature Review and Specific Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several other methods were developed based on MW-mile method, such as the unused capacity [13], the zero counter-flow [14], the dominant flow [15], and the MVA-mile [16]. Based on the power flow, the equivalent bilateral exchange method for cost allocation is proposed in [17]. In this method, it is considered that a portion of each generator, being the portion divided uniformly by all generators, supplies each load.…”
Section: Literature Review and Specific Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contribution of generator and load on the line flow can also be determined bydefining set of domains, commons and links [4]. The transmission cost allocation method based on equivalentbilateral exchanges [5] states that each demand is supplied by a fraction of each generator uniformly divided amongall generators. But this method uses dc power flow solution.…”
Section: Iintroductionmentioning
confidence: 99%