2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2018.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transmission measurements and resonance parameter analysis for Mo-98 and Mo-100

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One may note the neutron energies for this comparison, which are quite different from the usual value of 10 keV. These energies are taken from the earlier RIPL-1 compilation [24] except the case of more recent measurements [26,[36][37][38]. Nevertheless, these changes have no importance for the σ T (E) values around 1 MeV, which are of obvious importance for the competition between the neutron and chargedparticle decay of excited CN, in heavier Mo nuclei.…”
Section: A Compound and Pre-equilibrium Emissionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One may note the neutron energies for this comparison, which are quite different from the usual value of 10 keV. These energies are taken from the earlier RIPL-1 compilation [24] except the case of more recent measurements [26,[36][37][38]. Nevertheless, these changes have no importance for the σ T (E) values around 1 MeV, which are of obvious importance for the competition between the neutron and chargedparticle decay of excited CN, in heavier Mo nuclei.…”
Section: A Compound and Pre-equilibrium Emissionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparison of experimental[22,26,[36][37][38] and calculated s-and p-wave neutron strength functions S0 and S1, respectively, and the potential scattering radius R ′ [22] of93 Nb and92,[94][95][96][97][98]100 Mo isotopes, and the changes of either local or global real-potential depth v1 of the even and odd Mo isotopes[33], respectively (with the use of[33] notations, the energies are in MeV and geometry parameters in fm) which provide the best results within the SPRT method.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thermal neutron capture-cross section of 100 Mo is σ c = 0.199 ± 0.003 b. For epithermal, intermediate, and resonance energy neutrons, there is an increased probability of interaction on 100 Mo, and the resonance integral cross-section ( I c ) of 100 Mo is approximately I c = 3.76 ± 0.15 b 54 56 . The epithermal to thermal neutron capture cross section ratio is ~18.8.…”
Section: Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%