The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2010.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transmission loss of honeycomb sandwich structures with attached gas layers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tension was measured by adding mass to the center of the structure and measuring the out-of-plane displacement of the membrane as a function of mass magnitude (for further details, see Ref. 7).…”
Section: A Sample Fabricationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Tension was measured by adding mass to the center of the structure and measuring the out-of-plane displacement of the membrane as a function of mass magnitude (for further details, see Ref. 7).…”
Section: A Sample Fabricationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 Several approaches have been considered to improve acoustic insulation without increased weight penalty. These have included addition of mass inclusions to foam materials, 6 impedance mismatch of gas layers, 7 and the use of microperforated panels. 8 These approaches have shown varying degrees of improvement in sound insulation, although they have provided minimal increase in transmission loss (TL) (<20 dB) at low frequencies (<1000 Hz).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pores allow for the easy entrance of sound waves, and the sound waves are then debilitated by the fibers due to the boundary layer losses. Therefore, the sound absorption is high [8]. Moreover, the application of hot pressing is also conducive for sound absorption.…”
Section: Limited Oxygen Index (Loi) Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of metamaterials-concepts to realize unprecedented physical responses has met with considerable success. Analytical, numerical and experimental investigations on negative effective mass [16][17][18], double negativity [19], tunable absorption in and transmission through membrane-type acoustic metamaterials [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28], broadband noise mitigation using metamaterial panels with stacked membranes [29], impedance mismatch-driven reduction in transmitted sound energy for structures with attached gas layers [30], acoustic barriers utilizing cellular [31] and flexible [32,33] sub-structures, coupled membranes displaying monopolar and dipolar resonances [34], absorption using degenerate resonators [35], and targeted energy transfer from an acoustic medium to a nonlinear membrane [36] as well as for seismic mitigation [37] have been reported. There have been several studies ranging from tunable structural-scale AM [38,39] to active AM designs [40] that have clearly demonstrated their unique advantages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%