2012
DOI: 10.2320/matertrans.m2012002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transmission Electron Microscopy of Twins in 10M Martensite in Ni–Mn–Ga Ferromagnetic Shape Memory Alloy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(8 reference statements)
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is seen that the atoms of variants A and D are in mirror symmetry with respect to the theoretical compound twin interface. Such a stepped structure of the compound twin interface has also been observed in various other shape memory alloys (Nishida et al, 1998;Ge et al, 2006;Matsuda et al, 2012). This should be correlated with the general observations that compound twins exhibit very small twinning/detwinning resistance (Nishida et al, 2008;Chulist et al, 2013).…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is seen that the atoms of variants A and D are in mirror symmetry with respect to the theoretical compound twin interface. Such a stepped structure of the compound twin interface has also been observed in various other shape memory alloys (Nishida et al, 1998;Ge et al, 2006;Matsuda et al, 2012). This should be correlated with the general observations that compound twins exhibit very small twinning/detwinning resistance (Nishida et al, 2008;Chulist et al, 2013).…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Unlike the type I twin interface, the type II twin possesses a High-resolution transmission electron micrographs of the three kinds of twin interfaces -type I (a), type II (b) and compound (c) twins -and the corresponding measured and simulated electron diffraction patterns. K I 1 , K II 1 and K Compd stepped structure outlined with the white solid lines, which could explain the irrational index of the type II twin interface (Liu & Xie, 2003;Nishida et al, 2008;Matsuda et al, 2012). The average interface, obtained by connecting the intersections of the stepped interface segments, should be the twinning plane of type II twin f1:1321 2 2:6038g M , as outlined with the white dashed line in Fig.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 95%
“…At the nano-scale, the fine structure of the Type 1 and Type 2 interfaces was observed by HRTEM by Matsuda et al [49]. The results confirmed the assumption that the Type 2 interfaces are broader: while the periodic contrast from the structural modulations was clearly visible directly at the Type 1 interface, the contrast around the Type 2 interface was blurry and the interface itself appeared to be largely and randomly curved.…”
Section: Finer Structure Of the Mobile Interfacesupporting
confidence: 71%
“…In Otsuka's notation, the B33 structure is represented as a 4O (orthorhombic) structure in terms of the number of stacking layers and the Bravais lattice [4]; we, therefore, refer the B33 structure as a 4O structure henceforth. Many martensitic phases have been reported to possess a long-period stacking-ordered (LPSO) structure, for example, 18R in Cu-Al alloys [5], 9R in Cu-Zn alloys [6], 7R (14 M) in Ni-Al [7] alloys, 10 M and 14 M in Ni-Mn-Ga alloys [8,9] and 18R in Ti-Pd [10] alloys. Variations of the LPSO structure in these alloys have also been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%