2022
DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.21-0718
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transmission Dynamics of COVID-19 in Ghana and the Impact of Public Health Interventions

Abstract: This study characterized COVID-19 transmission in Ghana in 2020 and 2021 by estimating the time-varying reproduction number (Rt) and exploring its association with various public health interventions at the national and regional levels. Ghana experienced four pandemic waves, with epidemic peaks in July 2020 and January, August, and December 2021. The epidemic peak was the highest nationwide in December 2021 with Rt ≥ 2. Throughout 2020 and 2021, per-capita cumulative case count by region increased with populat… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, parallel investigations into time-varying reproduction numbers in Ghana [ 26 ], Cameroon [ 27 ], and Nigeria [ 28 ] further supported the outcomes of this study. More specifically, these studies collectively illustrate that from late March to April 2020, the effective/time-varying reproduction numbers predominantly fluctuated between 2.5 and 4 in the early stages of the epidemic, gradually declining to 1 by late April and early May, 2020.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Additionally, parallel investigations into time-varying reproduction numbers in Ghana [ 26 ], Cameroon [ 27 ], and Nigeria [ 28 ] further supported the outcomes of this study. More specifically, these studies collectively illustrate that from late March to April 2020, the effective/time-varying reproduction numbers predominantly fluctuated between 2.5 and 4 in the early stages of the epidemic, gradually declining to 1 by late April and early May, 2020.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…It is important to note that the epidemic control policy in Nigeria and Ghana 25 were relatively homogenous (especially during the early waves of the pandemic when this study was conducted), comprising of a combination of lockdowns, travel restriction and curfews, social distancing, quarantine, robust surveillance mechanisms, contact tracing and public health education 26 28 . Hence the heterogeneity in seroprevalence between the study sites may relate to Nigerian HCWs being at higher risk of exposure than the non HCW population that dominated the Ghanaian study site.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference could also be due to the sample concentration methods used in the studies (direct flocculation vs. two-phase (separation)). The regional variations in the confirmed cases of SARS-CoV-2 in Spain (218,652) [ 18 ], Italy (181,228) [ 12 ], and the Czech Republic (10,064) [ 17 ] compared to Ghana (153,514) [ 19 ] could have also influenced the positivity rates. We also observed that SARS-CoV-2 RNA was abundant in sewage ( n = 74) as compared to wastewater ( n = 280).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%