2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.03.29.20047118
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transmission Dynamics and Control Methodology of COVID-19: a Modeling Study

Abstract: The coronavirus disease 2019 has grown up to be a pandemic within a short span of time. To investigate transmission dynamics and then determine control methodology, we took epidemic in Wuhan as a study case. Unfortunately, to our best knowledge, the existing models are based on the common assumption that the total population follows a homogeneous spatial distribution, which is not the case for the prevalence occurred both in the community and in hospital due to the difference in the contact rate. To solve thi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(90 reference statements)
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that the average infectious period, assuming a symptomatic infectious period of 7 days was approximately 9.3 days (95% CI 7.8-10 days, where CI is only reported for the presymptomatic period). He et al 29 estimated that the proportion of all transmission that was presymptomatic was 44% (95% CI 25% to 37 used a mean prior of 10 days, with the model estimated mean duration being 12.5 days (variance 10; Weibull distribution). Piccolomiini and Zama 38 used a fixed estimate of 20-day infectious period to model the Italian epidemic.…”
Section: Infectious Period For Symptomatic Cases (T3+t5)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This suggests that the average infectious period, assuming a symptomatic infectious period of 7 days was approximately 9.3 days (95% CI 7.8-10 days, where CI is only reported for the presymptomatic period). He et al 29 estimated that the proportion of all transmission that was presymptomatic was 44% (95% CI 25% to 37 used a mean prior of 10 days, with the model estimated mean duration being 12.5 days (variance 10; Weibull distribution). Piccolomiini and Zama 38 used a fixed estimate of 20-day infectious period to model the Italian epidemic.…”
Section: Infectious Period For Symptomatic Cases (T3+t5)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These values may represent an overestimation of the infectious period; one study suggested that there was on average 2.5 days between end of infectiousness and 'removal' (recovery or death). 37 Cheng et al 33 provided evidence of transmissibility, based on attack rate from primary to secondary cases, at around symptom onset. The authors estimate cumulative infectiousness from onset, which suggests that 67% of total infectiousness potential occurs by the first day postonset.…”
Section: Overall Duration Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies that collated such information suggest mean durations of 18.07 days (95%ci: 15.14 -20.99), but with time to discharge being 4.96 days shorter (95%CI: 2.15-7.76) on average than time to death. These values may represent an over estimation of the infectiousperiod; one study suggested that there was on average 2.5 days between end of infectiousness and 'removal' (recovery or death) [37].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To estimate the unknown parameters, we employed a Sequential Quadratic Programming (SQP) algorithm for large-scale constrained optimization, which solved a sequence of optimization subproblems to minimize the objective function (6) satisfying all the constraints [ 9 ]. This algorithm has already been used for modeling purposes in the context of SARS-CoV-2 epidemic [ 10 ]. The model is based on 10 predefined parameters (i.e., N , S , E , I com , I hos , I icu , R , D , σ , and Îł ) and 9 parameters to be estimated (i.e., β com , β hos , β icu , υ com , υ hos , υ icu , Îź com , Îź hos , and Îź icu ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%