2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2012.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transmission cost allocation based on the modified Z-bus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Power tracking coefficient developed [20]with the help of kirchof's law for the active power flow tracking and revenue collected by individual generator determined. A method [21] suggested allocating the transmission fixed charge based on the modification of the impedance matrix in which real power flow through the line expressed in terms of load current also as electrical distance and voltage injection at the bus. Iteratively one by one impact of every generator selected on the network using the z-bus of the network [22] and transmission congestion cost determined based on the current decomposition method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Power tracking coefficient developed [20]with the help of kirchof's law for the active power flow tracking and revenue collected by individual generator determined. A method [21] suggested allocating the transmission fixed charge based on the modification of the impedance matrix in which real power flow through the line expressed in terms of load current also as electrical distance and voltage injection at the bus. Iteratively one by one impact of every generator selected on the network using the z-bus of the network [22] and transmission congestion cost determined based on the current decomposition method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of circuit theory to the TCA is another pricing scheme, widely applied in the literature [19,[23][24][25][26][27][28]. The circuit-theory-based approaches, including Z-bus model [23,24] as well as its modified forms [26,28], modified nodal equation (MNE) model [25], and transformer analogy (TA) model [27], have an important advantage over any cost allocation method, as previously described. These methods incorporate the network characteristics directly into the allocation process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results rely mostly on the principle applied to split the mutual terms, as the main causes of the nonlinearity, between the participants. A group of papers use the most common sharing principles, namely, proportional [29], quadratic [30], and equal sharing [19,28,31] to split the mutual terms, whereas the others [23][24][25][26][27] avoid the mutual terms by considering a single variable at a time. In [29], it is revealed that proportional and equal sharing principles bring about more reasonable results for reactive power allocation, compared with the single variable division.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A modified PQC approach considering the reactive power demand of the loads is presented in [7]. Methods based on power or current injection is presented in [8][9][10]. Power injections are derived in terms of real and imaginary currents which are traced to find the contribution of each source to load [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%